Julia Steiny: It’s Building Kids’ Vocabulary, Stupid.
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
E.D. Hirsch is an education thinker I greatly admire, largely because he's comfortable with specifics about what actual knowledge is. He's so specific -- very refreshing among squabbling education reformers -- that he assembled teams of experts to create the Core Knowledge Curriculum.
The simple idea embedded in Hirsch's large canon of writings is this: knowing more words makes a kid smarter. How? Consider his 2006 example that has haunted me since I first ran across it:
Jones sacrificed and knocked in a run.
As a confident reader, I can tell you what every one of those words means. But as a sports idiot, I read the sentence without comprehension. Which is to say I can't really read it. Any baseball nut can tell you exactly what the sentence means, because their understanding of the sport provides the context that give baseball meanings to "sacrifice," "knock" and "run."
Reading comprehension is all about understanding the context
Hirsch unpacks the above sentence by describing a bit about the landscape of baseball to help, say, a British reader understand how those words might be bent to mean what they do. Frankly, I learned details about America's favorite pastime that I never knew before. (Sports bore me to death. Sorry.)
Likewise, if I knew nothing about the Egyptians, on a test I might think the "mummies" were the moms. If the above sentence appeared in a reading comprehension test, I would have failed.
The SAT and even the GRE tests are essentially vocabulary tests. Whatever subjects you know well, you know by the vocabulary used to discuss them. If you don't know what "binomial probability" means, then surely you haven't a clue as to how to do the related math.
Build new contexts; build vocabulary
Not surprisingly, the Core Curriculum leans heavily on classic literature and actual history, geography, and civics -- as opposed to hard-to-define social studies. Designed for students pre-K through 8th grade, the Curriculum systematically teaches the sort of knowledge that was far more common in my day. Yes, modern works have been woven in, and in interesting ways. But the spine is, well, good old Western Civilization built out to be more inclusive and contemporary, but not dumbed-down. Rigorous literature and primary historical sources have chewy syntax and unfamiliar words. Challenging language requires more effort, but the pay-off is that, with teacher guidance, children enter new worlds that expand their horizons. Each new context, like baseball, has words or word-meanings all its own.
Contrast classical literature with the vapid, politically-correct writings found in the Basal readers developed by textbook companies whose goal is to market their wares. Textbook companies have long lists of rules that govern what goes into their sanitized texts, rules designed to reduce offense to easily-offended public School Committees. One rule is to avoid everything written before 1970 -- too many white male protagonists and authors, among many other sins. (For infuriating details on corporate educational publishers and why public-school kids read such drek, read Diane Ravitch's painful, but brilliant book, The Language Police.)
Classics are inevitably offensive because their values come out of other times, places and cultures. But it is precisely by taking a child into those other contexts that broaden their horizons and their historical, cultural and linguistic foundations.
Instead of actually reading broadly, kids learn "reading skills"
Hirsch says, "The idea that reading skill is largely a set of general-purpose maneuvers that can be applied to any and all texts is one of the main barriers to our students' achievement in reading. It is true that students benefit from learning and practicing reading comprehension skills, but a key point has gotten lost: More training in these skills is not necessarily better."
Today's new teachers have been taught to waste a lot of time on explicitly teaching the sorts of skills readers naturally pick up. Students have lessons in "reading strategies," like predicting, summarizing, questioning, clarifying and identifying the main idea. By all means give the kids the vocabulary for what they are doing when they discuss Charlotte's Web. Name "summarizing" when that's what they're doing. But Charlotte's world is vastly more important and interesting -- the farm, the critters, and the agricultural cycle that would normally turn Wilber into food. Help kids build vocabulary for all of it, the book and their approach to it.
We've grown so crazed with assessments, we've forgotten what on earth it is we're trying to measure. By all means measure. I love data. Measure words. You'll know kids mastered a subject if they have the vocabulary to talk about it intelligently. If we immerse students in real contexts that expand knowledge and build vocabulary, kids will have a shot at an education.
And, God help us, they'll get better test scores.
- Julia Steiny: Can’t Achieve STEM Goals without Computer Science
- Julia Steiny: Schools Help Minorities Become the Serfs of the Information Age
- Julia Steiny: A “Forest Kindergarten” Grows Great Kids
- Julia Steiny: A Smart Way To Engage Math-Haters
- Julia Steiny: At Last! A Computer Science Course For All Kids
- Julia Steiny: Best Beach Read—Paul Tough’s ‘How Children Succeed’
- Julia Steiny: Blackstone Academy ‘Kicks Butt’
- Julia Steiny: Bloodlust For Boston Bombers Won’t Aid Healing
- Julia Steiny: Bring Back The ‘C’ Grade
- Julia Steiny: Bringing Kids In Trouble Back From The Brink
- Julia Steiny: Careful What You Want & How You Measure Getting It
- Julia Steiny: Great Communities Are Happy, Healing Places
- Julia Steiny: High-Stakes Testing Works If Kids Go To School
- Julia Steiny: Middle-school Puberty–The Elephant in the Classroom
- Julia Steiny: Public Admits Being ‘Clueless’ About Education
- Julia Steiny: Public Schools Owe Neglected Kids More Than Academics
- Julia Steiny: Recess Is Good For Mental Health
- Julia Steiny: Teaching to a Tech-Savvy Generation
- Julia Steiny: The Importance of Having a Father
- Julia Steiny: There Is No Health Without Mental Health
- Julia Steiny: UK Expert Marc Armitage Brings Playwork To US Educators
- Julia Steiny: What Mom Rats Can Teach Us About Child Rearing
- Julia Steiny: What The Numbers Tell Us About The Class of 2013
- Julia Steiny: Why ‘Bad’ Moms Still Should Parent Their Kids
- Julia Steiny: Why Kids Still Need Computer Science