| | Advanced Search


State Report: Marijuana Tax + Bill Targets Prostitutes and Pimps—Plus increased sentences for gang crimes

John Rooke - Thinking Out Loud—JR's column on the sports stories and personalities…

RI Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

Arthur Schaper: Grand Theft Auto Cicilline—MINDSETTER Arthur Schaper examine's Cicilline's role in Prov's…

Five Live Music Musts – April 18, 2014—Great vibes await

Report: Preston Murphy Leaving URI for Boston College—Preston Murphy Leaves URI for Boston College

EXCLUSIVE: Bryant Tells Grads No Selfies with President at Grad—Prohibiting selfies?

PC Athletics gets high marks—Friar winter sports #1 among Big East schools...

NEW: Providence’s Al Forno Featured as a Best Pizza Spot in the US—Another accolade for Al Forno


Guest MINDSETTER™ Jane Zhang: Why Schools Need Sex Ed

Monday, November 26, 2012


Sex Education should be taught in the home. It is a family value. Ideally, parents should sit their children down and debunk the myth of storks delivering babies from pouched beaks. Ideally, parents should engage their children in detailed discussions of what sexual intercourse is, what the consequences are, how to say no or be safe, and how to plan for a baby. Perhaps they will even share their past mistakes, how their own children resulted from lapses in judgment. Perhaps they’ll divulge a tale of how they inherited chlamydia from that awkward one night stand in college. Of course that happened before they met their respective spouses, after which they whole-heartedly committed to family planning goals.

How realistic is the above picture? Can every parent muster the courage to informatively yet meaningfully educate their children about sex? Will every child diligently absorb the wise words of their elders? And what if there’s some misinformation? What if a child wanted to learn more about sexually transmitted infections and their parents weren’t equipped with appropriate knowledge? And what if the parent didn’t know the difference between gonorrhea and genital warts? They’re not the same thing.

We live by following examples. We are shaped by our surroundings. Take some time and reflect upon your life. Who did you admire while growing up? From whom did you seek mentorship, the guidance of which shaped you into the person that you are? Perhaps you were blessed enough to grow up in a community where parents had and would make the time to shuttle their children from soccer practice to chess club. Perhaps your parents taught you everything you needed to know about sexually transmitted infections, birth control, and family planning. And perhaps you didn’t walk by a juvenile detention center every day as part of your gym class. Not every student in Central Falls and other parts of the nation is so lucky.

So what about those left behind? What about those who grew up in broken homes, whose dad’s on parole; mom on welfare and working countless minimum wage jobs to foot the bill? That’s a reality for many Rhode Island teenagers. When their mother has had three kids by the time she was 20 and school friends are becoming impregnated, they’re influenced by what they see and hear. If their mother did it, why can’t they do it? And with the media becoming more lewd, who’s going to dispel fact from fiction regarding sex for Rhode Island’s youth? Usher and Rick Ross’ recent hit “Lemme See” has such lyrics as “switching positions … oh we so explicit”. These R & B sensations are certainly not referring to changing basketball positions.

So yes, sex education is a family value. But schools should fill in where parents may fail. We should advocate for comprehensive sex education at schools across Rhode Island. An academic article published in Public Health Reports titled “School-based Programs to Reduce Sexual Risk Behaviors: A Review of Effectiveness” reviewed numerous sexual education programs across America. It concluded that instruction on contraception did not accelerate the onset of intercourse and actually, these programs can even delay the onset of intercourse. Furthermore, there were no significant increases in sex frequency. In fact, two studies concluded that providing nearby reproductive health services did not increase the onset or frequency of sexual intercourse.

Research indicates that sexual health education that includes a contraceptive curriculum is effective against preventing unwanted teenage pregnancies as well as sexually transmitted infections. Rhode Island schools should implement comprehensive sexual education, which would at least entail but not limit to a discourse on what sexual intercourse is, what the consequences of sexual intercourse are, birth control options, abstinence and resistance methods, as well as family planning. Of course, the greatest stronghold of America lies in the power of choice. Should parents have their children opt out of such curricula due to religious or personal views, so be it. Nevertheless schools should offer comprehensive sex education in order to better protect and educate their youths.


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


tom brady

Again? Go away.

Ed Jucation

Agrees with tom.

Dave Barry


Dave Barry

Schools have been offering comprehensive sex education since the 70s. I don't know what this author is talking about. It is so comprehensive that a teacher in Warwick shared her personal oral skills on her boyfriend with her class of high schoolers. This is all good for the kids. Teen aged pregnancy is down...wait, it is still really high. Sexually transmitted diseases are down...no wait, they are rampant. Cases of oral cancer are down...no, wait...due to the sex ed teaching of oral sex, many cases of oral/throat cancer are up.

anthony sionni

sex ed? yeah and they need parents to!

pearl fanch

The majority of "children having children" are from homes of "children who had children". APPLE TREES MAKE APPLES.

Parents (and I mean REAL parents) will and do educate their children about sex, drugs and a million other topics.

Absentee parents don't.

pearl fanch

The majority of "children having children" are from homes of "children who had children". APPLES MAKE APPLES.

Parents (and I mean REAL parents) will and do educate their children about sex, drugs and a million other topics.

Absentee parents don't.

Janet Brooks

To Pearl Fanch:

Snobbishly, I enjoy reading commentaries with substance and character.

Your comment “APPLES MAKE APPLES” is already implicitly stated in Jane’s comment in the 3rd paragraph, “We live by following examples. We are shaped by our surroundings.” Is that not what your apple comment intends to convey?

Additionally, you wrote: “Parents (and I mean REAL parents) will and do educate their children about sex, drugs and a million other topics. Absentee parents don't.” Based on my humble SAT level reading comprehension skills, I believe that’s the entire theme of paragraph 4 in Jane’s editorial.

The crux of Jane’s editorial is the first 2 sentences of paragraph 4, “So yes, sex education is a family value. But schools should fill in where parents may fail.” She’s agreeing with everything you’ve mentioned, but has furthered her editorial by adding a solution to the problem in the last 2 paragraphs of the editorial.

Basically, you have only summed up everything that Jane’s already described in paragraphs 1 through 4. Personally, I think Jane should thank you for agreeing with supporting everything she’s already described.

At least, Dave Barry introduces a counterargument, which was more interesting to read.

pearl fanch

Janet, get a life.

Janet Brooks

wow pearl, what an intellectual comeback

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.