| | Advanced Search

 

URI’s Mazze on Economic Forecast: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back—URI's Mazze on Economic Forecast: Two Steps Forward,…

Report: Gist Misses Most Achievement Gap Target Numbers—see where the schools are falling short

Lisa Blais: Providence Goes After Water, Homeowners To Fix Budget—A tale of political manipulation...

Women & Infants: 8 Tips For Healthy Exercise When Pregnant—Be healthy and be safe...

RI Small Business Journal + Pat Paolino Cruz Join Forces—Relaunch of New England WOMAN Magazine...

R.I. Basketball Star Charles Correa of St. Ray’s Commits to Dean—Basketball star commits to college...

MUSIC: Bernie Worrell Orchestra—Rock Royalty in Westerly—Rocking the house in South County...

Scott Cordischi On Sports: Sergio Pulls a Fuzzy—makes racist comment about Tiger Woods

Half of RI Renters Spend Over 30% of Income on Rent—Half of RI Renters Spend Over 30% of…

LEGAL MATTERS: How To Beat That Speeding Ticket—avoid the insurance hikes with these easy tips

 
 

Guest MINDSETTER™ Dr. Harold G. Devine: Should All Students Learn English?

Wednesday, June 06, 2012

 

In the May 31 edition of the LA Times, I saw an article that just made my hair hurt. My good friends from the ACLU of Southern California have filed a lawsuit alleging that, “State officials are neglecting their legal obligation to insure that students who are learning English are receiving an adequate and equal education.”

The suit alleges that the Dinuba Unified School District does a lousy job of educating English language learning (ELL) students and that may or may not be true. The essence of this lawsuit, however, is demanding something quite different. The lawsuit demands that, while students are learning to speak English, the school district has a duty to insure that they “keep pace academically with their peers across California”.

Now I have only been in education for forty seven (47) years and I’m sure that I don’t know nearly as much about teaching and learning as does the ACLU of Southern California. However, I do know that, until a student becomes proficient in English, he or she will never keep pace academically with his/her English speaking peers.

When you look through the rhetoric, it becomes clear that in order to “keep pace academically with their peers”, students would have to be taught all of the other subjects in their native language. That is the 500 lb. gorilla sitting right in the middle of this lawsuit.

That is quite different than the belief that students in the United States need to learn English in order to become assimilated into American culture. If you take the potential consequences of this lawsuit to its ridiculous extreme, it wouldn’t matter a lick whether or not an ELL student ever learned to speak the English language as long as they “kept pace academically with their peers across California”, whatever that might mean.
Besides the expenditure of hundreds of millions of dollars which would be necessary to perpetuate the expansion of bi-lingual education, the unintended (perhaps) consequence of this legislation would be a retardation of the efficiency of the assimilation of students into the English speaking mainstream.

With the development of high quality differentiated instructional materials becoming available to schools and students, the journey into the unrestricted classroom should come more rapidly. Teachers can now structure learning environments that address the variety of learning abilities found within a classroom. For example, it is now possible for students in the same classroom to read the same content article which has been written at several different levels of comprehension. This type of material is great for all kinds of learners, including ELL students.

There are a few understandings that must be made lest my opinions become distorted in the self serving rhetoric which has become so common to this whole issue. I am speaking about structured immersion as opposed to submersion. The difference is simple and should not be misunderstood. In structured immersion, students are taught English until they are prepared to function in a regular classroom without any additional assistance. In submersion students are placed into regular subject classrooms and taught in English all of the time. It’s sort of like the non-swimmers who are tossed into the deep end of the pool to sink or swim.

Critics of any type of direct English instruction argue that the research is inconclusive. Some of the research that I have seen is not very rigorous and some just plain sloppy.

Simple common sense should tell us that to become contributing members of the American culture, students should learn English as quickly and effectively as possible; unless, of course, assimilation into the American culture is not really the main goal at all.
 

Dr. Harold Devine began his teaching career in Providence, RI. He subsequently served as the Superintendent of Schools in Swansea, MA, Acushnet, MA and most recently as Superintendent of Schools in Little Compton, RI. He presently is serving as the Interim Executive Director at the East Bay Educational Collaborative in Warren, RI.

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

pearl fanch

How is this even a question?????
YES, of course they should learn English.
If people come to America, it NEEDS to be a requirement that they learn to speak English. It shouldn't be up to Americans to learn various different languages.
I'm sick and tired of pushing one for English!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chris MacWilliams

Enforce immigration laws and this problem would go away

bob ingerson

it's time this country and state had an official language. english has been spoken in this country for over 200 years, it's time to make it official.

R G

If the author has been in education for 47 years they certainly haven't kept up with research and sure like anecdotes.

Granted I'm an ESL teacher by training, but a good percentage of major research shows that students learn a second language (in this case English) fastest by being supported in their first language. Bilingual education is actually the gate keeper to faster language assimilation. I'd be happy to point the author in the direction of actual research if they are interested.

Joseph Fazio

Sorry Doc, you just don't get it. Valuable resources, diluted standards, and a compromised educational system all to make people feel good about themselves? You have kids graduating from RI high schools that have been in the ESL programs for 4 years and have VERY little command of the English language. But hey, that's ok. Check out the bi-lingual labels and menus. Why bother? The U.S, is only a transit point. Keep pumping millions of taxpayers dollars into ESL programs, BUT don't blame teachers when kids can't read those stupid standardized tests....which are in ENGLISH.

Billy Santos

Are you kidding me!! This should not even be a topic ! Screw the ACLU and Bum Brown !! I have been all over the world. Though they speak English in the area of tourists, the schools expect you to learn their language.. Plain and simple !! If my Grandparents learned the language then why can't everyone else... Keep catering to them.. That goes for all people of all race.... UNREAL




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.