Guest MINDSETTER™ David Cicilline: How to Reclaim Rhode Island’s Manufacturing Legacy
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
As the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution, Rhode Island has always identified itself as a center for manufacturing.
Whether it was textile mills in Pawtucket, rubber factories in Woonsocket, shipbuilding assembly lines in Newport, or the jewelry shops throughout Rhode Island, manufacturing gave our state its identity and provided economic security for countless working families over generations.

As the U.S. Congressman for Rhode Island’s First District I recently took part in a panel discussion on manufacturing at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. as the first event held under the auspices of the John Hazen White, Jr. Forum on Public Policy to study manufacturing. And, as the forum underscored, policymakers at every level in our state need to work together to enact a comprehensive strategy that recognizes the importance of our manufacturing sector in providing more Rhode Islanders the long-term economic security they need.
A comprehensive strategy to put our state back to work should begin with training our workforce so Rhode Islanders have the skills they need to compete for 21st century manufacturing jobs. We owe it to our young people and adult workers to make sure that they are equipped with the knowledge to navigate a global economy – especially its manufacturing sector. John Hazen White, Jr.’s company, Taco, Inc., has been doing this since 1992 with its own workforce right here in Rhode Island, and competes successfully on a global basis.
Lawmakers should be working to enact comprehensive workforce development legislation that meets the needs of employers and helps build a pipeline of skilled workers ready to compete in the 21st century economy.
My legislation to establish a Make it in America Block Grant Program, for example, would provide targeted federal grants that will help small to medium-sized manufacturers to retool their factories and retrain their workers – focusing resources in states, cities, and towns that have been hardest hit by the recession. The Brookings Institution recently highlighted the legislation and called for greater attention to the proposal. Similarly, legislation like the AMERICA Works Act would help workers obtain certifications, degrees, and qualifications for high demand jobs in manufacturing.
In addition, we need to take concrete steps to help our small businesses, start-ups, innovators and entrepreneurs succeed in Rhode Island. Small businesses are our economic engines. In fact, in Rhode Island in 2010, 90% of all private sector employers were small businesses with fewer than 20 employees. These small firms provided jobs for more than 25% of the state’s private sector workforce.
And, in order to provide sustained demand for the goods our small businesses produce, we have to protect and strengthen our middle class. A critical portion of this strategy is to put more money into the pockets of middle class families, in part, by extending tax cuts for middle class families and targeted tax credits that help businesses create jobs and strengthen the economy.
But none of these initiatives will get our state moving again unless we devote our time and energy to making things in Rhode Island. In our state, and throughout the country, we need to ensure that we can take advantage of new manufacturing opportunities and market conditions. The House took an important step recently in passing the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act, legislation I co-sponsored, which calls for a comprehensive national strategy to support manufacturing through policies that promote economic growth, competitiveness, innovation, and the creation of well-paying jobs.
In addition, we need to give Rhode Island manufacturers a fighting chance by leveling the playing field in tax and trade policies. We need to overhaul our overly complicated and inefficient corporate tax system while also implementing tax policies that reward companies for keeping well-paying manufacturing jobs right here in America.
The Offshoring Prevention Act, introduced by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse in the Senate and myself in the House, would end tax policies that encourage companies to ship jobs overseas. In addition, the Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act would end the practice of our trading partners, especially the Chinese, devaluing their currency to gain an unfair trading advantage.
Unfortunately, in the past year, too many of our leaders in Washington have failed to set aside politics in the pursuit of a bipartisan agenda to get our country moving again.
This needs to change. In my work for Rhode Island I am going to continue to bring together lawmakers from both parties to reinvigorate manufacturing and create an economic climate that enables our state to thrive.
From Samuel Slater through the mid-20th century, Rhode Island was defined as one of our country’s leading manufacturing states. It’s time we reclaim that legacy and make Rhode Island a manufacturing center of excellence again.
David Cicilline represents Rhode Island’s 1st District.
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.



Comments:
Odd Job
3:08am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Get Lost you scumbag!!
anthony sionni
5:18am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Remember during the 2010 election when cicilline made his made in america commercial, he hired all outsiders from washington to film his commercial. I guess he wasn't to concerned about hiring Rhode Islanders for the jobs!
#wakeuppeople
anthony sionni
5:20am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
*those jobs
anthony sionni
5:25am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Will these grants be like your PEDP slush fund? Why didn't you come up with this 2 years ago?
#wakeuppeople
Joe Public
6:28am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
He wants to pass a program of "targeted federal grants." Targeted at his political supporters/campaign donors, like PEDP? He says the Brookings Institution called for "greater attention to the proposal"? Oh, it should get greater attention, like PEDP got greater attention. But hopefully this time the scams can be prevented, instead of detected after the fact.
Michael Napolitano
7:21am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
David Cicilline has had 2 years in Congress to implement plans and has done NOTHING! In fact Rhode Island ranks 50th for business, 2nd for unemployment and also gets a D- for transparency! We rank at or near the bottom in most key categories. The Democrats control all 4 seats in Washington and 90% of the General Assembly. With all of that power what have they really done for RI.
In addition, since Cicilline and his fellow Democrats have no record to run on, their campaign advertising is full of scare tactics regarding Medicare and Social Security. Looking at Cicilline’s political resume one can see he FAILED in Providence and bailed leaving the city holding the bag while he ran for Congress. He needs to be sent packing!
Joseph Davis
8:40am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
The only jobs program Cicilline ever had was hiring people to vote in place of those on his NC list.
And even then, he hired people from New Bedford.
Craig Balme
8:55am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
w
David Allen
9:38am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Cicilline sponsored (not co-sponsored) 10 pieces of legislation and all those he put forward failed. He is not effective, he is not a leader and he cannot reach across the aisle to get things done for Rhode Island.
He voted with Pelosi 96.9% of time - that is not reaching across the aisle to get things done. Compare his record to Scott Brown, who voted with his party 54% of the time.
Vote Cicilline OUT.
Captain Blacksocks
5:59pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
So long David. It's been entertaining, but the party is over. I think there is an after party you may want to attend to drown your sorrows with Barney Frank, Elizabeth Roberts, Jim Langevin and Barack OBama.
Captain Blacksocks
6:06pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Hey, are there any tax accountants or international business people out there who can comment on this part?
"The Offshoring Prevention Act, introduced by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse in the Senate and myself in the House, would end tax policies that encourage companies to ship jobs overseas."
Are there REALLY any significant tax incentives that "encourage" companies to ship jobs overseas? I hear this all the time from democats and I can't find anything that shows it to be true.
I can't conceive of the US Congress being so stupid as to give real tax incentives to any company that takes a a pack of US jobx (which contribute taxes) and ship those overseas (where foreign employee will not pay US taxes). Willing to be proved wrong on this. Anyone? Buhler?...Buhler??
Captain Blacksocks
6:14pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
I disagree with the whole premise of this article. RI does not simply need more manufacturing jobs. That would be logical result of other things that must happen FIRST. In order to get more manufacturing jobs, or more tech jobs, more healthcare jobs -- more of any kind of jobs -- to RI, these things all need to happen FIRST, and that's what a RI congressman should be fighting for FIRST:
-Get rid of RI's terrible reputation for corruption and cronyism. It drives good companies away and keeps potential companies from taking this state seriously.
-Get rid of RI's anti-business tax structure. It also prevents most smart companies from picking RI over many other more business-friendly states.
-Get rid of the massive influence of unions. Companies -- manufacturing or otherwise -- are not going to locate in a state that gives huge power to unions.
Restoring RI's manufacturing glory days is a fantasy until the above problems are fixed. What progress has been made in the past few years? Nada. Progress has gone in REVERSE.
Captain Blacksocks
6:22pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Let's assume for a moment that RI passes some sort of legislation that somehow penalizes RI companies that begin to ship some jobs overseas. If that is an important strategy for the company (to be more competitive in a global market), isn't it logical that the RI company would just move from RI to another state that's not going to penalize them? In that case, not only the RI manufacturing jobs are lost, but gone with it are that company's tech, marketing, sales, and ALL other employees. Is it not better to just make RI a more business-friendly state rather than heaping on new regulations and penalties on this state's employers? Just asking.
pearl fanch
8:39am on Friday, October 12, 2012
Davey, two years ago, you ran on a campaign platform that stated.....send me to Washington and I'll bring back jobs to RI.
You brought back ZERO jobs. Now you have the balls to ask for re-election? Hang your head and walk away slowly, you rotten S O B.