Welcome! Login | Register
 

Horowitz: Give Obama Fast Track Authority on Asian Trade Pact—President Obama is on the cusp of a…

Moore: Elorza’s Budget is a Bridge To Nowhere—Moore: Elorza's Budget is a Bridge To Nowhere

Secrets and Scandals - Reforming Rhode Island 1986-2006, Chapter Nine—Between 1986 and 2006, Rhode Island ran a…

Jencunas: A Tribute to Professor Jay Goodman—Professor Jay Goodman had a story for every…

Personal Tech For Women: 5 Things To Know About Tracking Your Stuff—Losing things – whether it’s your keys, wallet,…

Middletown’s Paradise Farmhouse Named “Best Retreat House” by Yankee Magazine—The Paradise Farmhouse at the Norman Bird Sanctuary…

Brown Lax Earns 1st NCAA Tourney Berth Since 2009—Brown Lax Earns 1st NCAA Tourney Berth Since…

Bryant Lax to Visit Marist For NCAA Tourney Play-in Game—Bryant Lax to Visit Marist For NCAA Tourney…

Smart Benefits: Exchange Funding - What’s Next?—Federal dollars funded the start up of Rhode…

Revolution Unbeaten In Seven-Straight, Win 2-1 Over New York—The New England Revolution continue their early season…

 
 

Gay Marriage Intrigue at Statehouse

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

 

As the gay marriage bill remains stalled in the House Judiciary Committee, Statehouse sources tell GoLocalProv that there is widespread talk that House Speaker Gordon Fox might intervene to get the bill out of the committee.

As the Speaker, House rules allow Fox to vote as an ex officio member of the committee. Several Statehouse sources say that could be one way to get the bill out of Judiciary. “I think he might come in and vote for it,” said Judiciary Committee member Charlene Lima.

Edith Ajello, the chair of the committee, confirmed that the possibility of having the Speaker vote had been discussed in a meeting of supporters of the bill. She couldn't recall when the meeting was or exactly who was in attendance.

Spokesman disputes sources' account

Asked if Fox planned on voting in the committee, spokesman Larry Berman yesterday said such questions were premature, since a date for the vote had not even been set. He said he did not know whether Fox would participate in the vote or not. “There’s nothing to it at this point,” Berman said.

Ajello said Fox’s vote would not be necessary for the measure to pass her committee. She said she believes the committee has enough votes to pass it, although she declined to provide a vote tally or a breakdown of who was for and against it—saying she did not want to speak for individual members.

But a GoLocalProv tally of the votes shows that the bill still faces an uphill battle. Based on interviews and public statements of the reps, GoLocalProv counts three confirmed yes votes and five no votes. That leaves six reps who did not respond to inquiries in time for publication and one who did, but said he did not yet have a public position on the bill.

If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.


 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 
:)