Welcome! Login | Register
 

Moore: Will PawSox Move be a Sweetheart, Insider Deal?—Moore: Will Pawsox Move Be A Sweetheart, Insider…

David Brussat, Dr. Downtown: The Red Sox and the PawSox—Pawtucket’s Triple-A baseball team was a feeder of…

NEW: RI Gas Prices Rise 8 Cents From Last Week—Rhode Island gas prices have gone up eight…

Smart Benefits: RI’s Uninsured Down Nearly 4% in 2014—According to a recent Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index

Henton’s 25 Points Lead #25 PC Past Marquette, 77-66—Friars beat Marquette 77-66 to earn 10th conference…

College Admissions: 6 Biggest Lies in College Admissions—Make sure you're wise to their lies...

Well-Read: Reading With Robin - (It really is) All About That Book..and a few giveaways!*—What started out in 2002 with the selection…

URI Holds On For 59-56 Win Over La Salle—URI beats La Salle 59-56, Stays in first…

Brown FallsTo Princeton 80-62 on Senior Night—Brown falls 80-62 to Princeton on senior night.

Tobacco Free RI to Celebrate 10 Year Anniversary of Smoke Free Workplaces—Sunday, March 1 will mark the 10 year…

 
 

Gay Marriage Intrigue at Statehouse

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

 

As the gay marriage bill remains stalled in the House Judiciary Committee, Statehouse sources tell GoLocalProv that there is widespread talk that House Speaker Gordon Fox might intervene to get the bill out of the committee.

As the Speaker, House rules allow Fox to vote as an ex officio member of the committee. Several Statehouse sources say that could be one way to get the bill out of Judiciary. “I think he might come in and vote for it,” said Judiciary Committee member Charlene Lima.

Edith Ajello, the chair of the committee, confirmed that the possibility of having the Speaker vote had been discussed in a meeting of supporters of the bill. She couldn't recall when the meeting was or exactly who was in attendance.

Spokesman disputes sources' account

Asked if Fox planned on voting in the committee, spokesman Larry Berman yesterday said such questions were premature, since a date for the vote had not even been set. He said he did not know whether Fox would participate in the vote or not. “There’s nothing to it at this point,” Berman said.

Ajello said Fox’s vote would not be necessary for the measure to pass her committee. She said she believes the committee has enough votes to pass it, although she declined to provide a vote tally or a breakdown of who was for and against it—saying she did not want to speak for individual members.

But a GoLocalProv tally of the votes shows that the bill still faces an uphill battle. Based on interviews and public statements of the reps, GoLocalProv counts three confirmed yes votes and five no votes. That leaves six reps who did not respond to inquiries in time for publication and one who did, but said he did not yet have a public position on the bill.

If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.


 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 
:)