| | Advanced Search


Fall Activities for the Whole Family—Mark your calendars for the best activities of…

Skywatching: Seagrave Memorial Observatory Centennial (1914-2014)—Skyscrapers, Inc., the Amateur Astronomical Society of Rhode…

Friday Financial Five - August 29, 2014—The Tax Foundation has put together a helpful…

RI Resource Recovery Collected 6K Pounds of Clothes—RI Resource Recovery has received more than 6,000…

5 Live Music Musts - August 29, 2014—We’ve got Rhythm and Roots and a whole…

The Cellar: Late Summer Values—While this week saw some fantastic weather there…

URI Ranked in Top 50 of LGBTQ-Friendly Universities in the Country—The University of Rhode Island has been ranked…

RI Politicians Who Sought Redemption from Misdeeds—See the Rhode Island politicians who have bounced…

Fall’s Best Foodie Events—Something that's different now -- much different than…

Brian Counihan Joins Iron Works Tavern as Executive Chef—Chef Brian Counihan has joined the team at…


DCYF Spends $10 Million Sending Kids Out of State

Friday, September 21, 2012


The Department of Children, Youth, and Families spends about $10 million a year sending children under its care to high-priced out-of-state facilities as far away as Florida and Tennessee, state records show.

In 2011, Rhode Island DCYF spent $9.7 million to send 108 children over the course of the fiscal year to 33 residential treatment facilities in other states, at an average annual cost of $90,000 per child. Most facilities were in Massachusetts, but many were farther away. Receiver states included South Carolina, Pennsylvania, New York, and Vermont.

Rhode Island spent substantially more, about $18.8 million, on in-state residential facilities in 2011, but those facilities also cost less per child—on average, about $33,000.

In 2010, there was a comparable ratio of in- to out-of-state spending, with $10.4 million spent on 121 kids at out-of-state facilities.

A report issued that year revealed that Rhode Island was institutionalizing children at a rate 80 percent above the national average and also was “export[ing]” children to other states at an “alarmingly high rate.” The report, which was issued by the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, claimed that the lucrative revenue social service agencies receive in the per diem rates they charge states like Rhode Island was driving the demand to institutionalize children.

Sending a child or teenager to a residential treatment program out of state is more expensive because of their complex behavioral and psychological needs, said Kevin Aucoin, the deputy director of DCYF. He said a child would only be sent out of state because those needs cannot be met at a local facility. 

In recent years, the state department has reduced the number of children it sends out of state: from a high of 50 on any given day in 2010 to 36 as of this past Tuesday, according to Aucoin.

However, as the number of troubled children leaving state has dropped, the cost remains high. On an annualized basis, the current average cost per out-of-state child is about $152,000.

 Sending millions of dollars out of state

Instead of spending so much to send kids out of state, Rep. Roberto DaSilva, D-East Providence, says DCYF should be channeling those funds into Rhode Island. But when he filed legislation in 2011 aimed at doing just that it died in committee after the chief justice of the Rhode Island Family Court issued a letter to General Assembly leaders opposing the measure.

“They’re sending millions of taxpayer dollars out of state under the guise that you can’t find these services here,” DaSilva said in a recent interview.

He said local social service agencies should be given the opportunity to develop the programs for which DCYF is sending kids to out-of-state facilities. “You give them the opportunity to develop a program and they will—that’s what I heard from some of the providers,” DaSilva said.

But Aucoin said the law already imposes limitations on when children are sent away. He said that an out-of-state placement happens only when there is no local program available to meet the needs of that particular child—and the law mandating that, he added, has been on the books since the 1980s.

Local provider says he was passed over

But the head of one DCYF provider says that’s just not what happens from his experience.

The official, an executive director who would speak only on the condition of anonymity since he still relies on revenue from the state, said he met with DCYF officials two years ago, informing them that he was closing down one program at his facility due to declining referrals. He said he offered to develop a new program that DCYF might need in Rhode Island.

“They basically said, ‘We’ll get back to you,’” he recalled. “Nothing has ever happened since then.”

Instead, his facility had to lay off 15 to 17 employees.

This year DCYF overhauled its placement system in a move that Aucoin suggested would continue the trend towards more in-state placements. Under the new system, there are two networks each overseen by a private agency: the Ocean State Network for Children and Families, managed by Family Service of Rhode Island, and the Rhode Island Care Placement Network, handled by Child and Family Services.

But the service provider who spoke with GoLocalProv said so far he personally hasn’t seen any move to boost in-state placements under the new system. And, he said the blame rests as much on DCYF as it does on Family Court, which he said often sends kids out of state even when DCYF recommends that they stay here. The ability of the courts to override DCYF is what would have changed under the DaSilva bill.

Monitoring abuse and neglect

DaSilva was inspired to submit his bill by the story of Nicholas Alahverdian, who was in the state child welfare system from the ages of 12 to 18, spending some of that time in two out-of-state facilities where he allegedly suffered abuse and neglect.

DaSilva said that it’s harder to monitor potential cases of abuse and neglect when a child resides out of state. “When a child is out of state where is that level of oversight?” DaSilva said.

At one time, DCYF relied on a private consultant, Placement Solutions, to check up on Rhode Island children who were placed out of state. The company made visits to children in nearby states once every three months. For those farther away: visits were once every six months, according to the report issued by the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform.

The contract with Placement Solutions expired earlier this year and now DCYF personnel do the checkups themselves, Aucoin said. Children close-by—say in Massachusetts or another New England state—are now visited monthly. But those farther away still can go for as long as six months without seeing someone from Rhode Island DCYF, according to Aucoin.

But he insisted that the state’s system for monitoring abuse is robust. “The department has always been very vigilant and strong in its oversight capacity,” Aucoin said. “I believe that the licensing oversight has provided the department with the opportunity to insure the safety and well-being of children.”

Accusations of abuse and neglect out of state would be investigated by DCYF’s sister agencies in those states, Aucoin said. But, he added that DCYF has the right to send its own representative to evaluate the situation and make an independent recommendation on whether Rhode Island children should be kept at the facility—even if those children are not the direct victims of the alleged abuse or neglect at the facility.

Aucoin said he could not recall any out-of-state facilities where there was a substantiated case of abuse or neglect of a child from Rhode Island.

DCYF changes direction

Almost everyone contacted for this report by GoLocalProv said one of the most important reasons for keeping children in Rhode Island is psychological, not financial.

“I think the general rule is that if there are ways to address the needs of a child or youth at home in Rhode Island that is the way to go,” said Elizabeth Burke Bryant, the executive director of Rhode Island KIDS COUNT.

Only in cases where a specialized service is not available in state should a child be sent away, Bryant said.

Alahverdian told GoLocalProv that it can be traumatic for a child or teenager to be moved so far away from his family, his school, and his friends. “Everything you know—every person you know—is erased. To have that happen at a young age … it can be traumatic,” Alahverdian said.

Aucoin agreed that it’s ideal to keep kids local. He said there had been a “paradigm shift” at his agency and across the country in the past four to five years as child welfare agencies have begun to rethink the benefits of treating children at residential programs. He said the shift has been towards services that are more family and community-based.

Aucoin points to the fact that 68 percent of all children removed from their families are now in foster homes rather than residential treatment facilities as evidence that the shift has produced a real change in the system.

Experts like Bryant and Aucoin seem to have reached a consensus: the new approach is not only cheaper, it’s better for the kids.

But without a change in the law to rein in court-ordered out-of-state placements, DaSilva says there’s no guarantee that the trend towards keeping children in Rhode Island will continue. DaSilva, who will not be returning to the General Assembly next year after losing a close primary battle for the state Senate, says he still hopes to get some of his former colleagues to re-introduce the legislation in the next session.


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Another missed opportunity to be a leader in an important area to form a creative and basic support system to bring up kids from delinquent parents.
The judicial branch unfortunately is made up of retreads from former political lives or friends of pols that get put in authority without merit.
The laws were put in place by part time GA members for whatever self-serving reasons and the DCYF has distributed their authority and responsibility so they are not held fully accountable.
So what does that give us, exactly what we have a disconnected and mismanaged group of money sucking businesses that are feasting off busted up kids from missing in action parents? Have a consultant(s) come in and reform DCYF, make corrective actions and put the financial responsibility on the backs of the parents. $100K to $150K/year to provide some half-baked support is exactly what RI is known for, no credible leadership in our political and social services. Just wasting money.

Comment #1 by Gary Arnold on 2012 09 21

Not that I like to defend RI's dumb government, but...it is very possible that RI does not have nearly enough in-state facilities to care for the volume of cases handled by the DCYF. The cost of sending troubled kids out of state for a few months of care is probably very small compared to cost of sending them to the ACI. What is the per-capita of teenager to available treat facility in RI compared to other states. I bet we operate very few.

Comment #2 by Captain Blacksocks on 2012 09 21

@Captain Blacksocks

There are enough in-state providers. Did you read the article? Even if there are not in-state providers, DCYF refuses to build upon its shoddy infrastructure, like they did with Beale's anonymous source.

And do your research - kids don't get sent to the ACI. They were/probably still are being shuffled from shelter to shelter each night.

Comment #3 by hannah metz on 2012 09 22

Aucoin says:

"The department has always been very vigilant and strong in its oversight capacity."

Is he talking, or is it his toupee? Either one that is speaking; they are both deceiving.

If that is so, then why was there a need for a long overdue "inspection blitz?" (See ProJo article below.)

R.I. DCYF orders inspection blitz of residential homes

By Lynn Arditi

PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- The state Department of Children, Youth and Families on Wednesday launched inspections of all 76 licensed residential facilities housing more than 400 children after investigators last week discovered violations at a Middletown group home and promptly shut it down.

The inspection blitz was prompted by the discovery of violations at the Middletown group home on Maple Avenue, Kevin J. Aucoin, the department's deputy director, said. The group home's operator, the nonprofit Child & Family of Newport, has submitted a plan to correct the problems and the home will be re-inspected Thursday, he said.

Seven boys, ages 6 to 12, were moved out of the home last Friday and the state placed a "hold" on its license, Aucoin said.

And Alahverdian never suffered out of state? Haha...



Comment #4 by Buddy Carcieri on 2012 09 22

Here is an example of one of the places that Alahverdian went to:

The moratorium stems from complaint investigations AHCA filed on Feb. 25 and March 4 concerning patient care and safety at Manatee Palms. On two occasions, patients complaining of injuries that turned out to be fractured bones, were forced to wait several hours before diagnosis and treatment. Another patient with a history of self-injury cut himself or herself with glass during a game of kickball in the gymnasium.

Agency investigators later visited the hospital and found corrective actions proposed by Manatee Palms had not been taken, the order said.

“The Respondent’s Facility currently suffers from substandard conditions and deficient practices with respect to its operating standards and program standards that are severe enough that they pose an immediate threat to the health and safety of the Facility’s clients,” the order read.

Read more here: http://www.bradenton.com/2010/05/06/2263147/manatee-palms-hospital-slammed.html#storylink=cpy

Does this sound like acceptable use of tax dollars, regardless of the welfare of the child?


Comment #5 by Buddy Carcieri on 2012 09 22

Check the Family court judges bank ,investment and real estate records. Some one is making a fortune on this .

Comment #6 by b croft on 2012 09 23

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.