| | Advanced Search

 

Fit for Life: Want to Lose Weight? Ready, Set, GO!—There really are only 3 ways to lose…

John Rooke - Thinking Out Loud—JR's column on the sports stories and personalities…

RI Beauty Insider: Nautical Chic - The Breton T-shirt—Striped cabanas and awnings have always been evocative…

Urban Gardener: Glory Days—Urban gardeners rejoice as their gardens leap and…

Clark University Study Finds LGB Parents and Their Children Functioning Well—Clark University Study Finds LGB Parents and Their…

Report: Hendricken’s Mazzulla Offered Hoops Scholarship to BC—Report: Hendricken's Mazzulla Offered Hoops Scholarship to BC

RI Earns F Grade for Small Business Friendliness—NEW: RI Earns F Grade for Small Business…

Chafee Nominates 2 Council Chairs to Board of Education—Governor Lincoln D. Chafee has nominated Michael Bernstein…

Kwan Pushes Pell’s Women’s Equality Agenda in New TV Ad—Kwan Pushes Pell's Women's Equality Agenda in New…

Side of the Rhode: Who’s Hot and Who’s Not in RI Politics?—Side of the Rhode: Who’s Hot and Who’s…

 
 

Dan Lawlor: Why Can’t Rhode Islanders Give a Little More?

Monday, December 03, 2012

 

If you're in the mob, it's called bribery. If you're a lobbyist, it's called an investment.

We are just wrapping up an depressingly expensive campaign cycle. Millions of dollars were raised and spent in the Congressional and Presidential races. Locally, hundreds of thousands, coordinated by special interest groups, were spent on both primary and general election races for General Assembly.
 
Yet, I'm not going to talk about party politics. I'm going to talk about community work.

 
Rhode Island ranks 46 out of 50 in charitable giving, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Positively, despite our rough economy, Rhode Islanders give more to charity than all other New England states except Connecticut (45th). On the other hand, dozens of state have us beat.
 
I know many will say, "Rhode Islanders don't give much because the economy is a mess." The economy is a factor, but it's not everything.
 
Mississippi, not known for being an economic dynamo, ranked second nationally in its charitable giving. According to the Chronicle, in 2008, "The average Mississippi household donated 7.2 percent of its discretionary income to charity. " 7.2%!
 
Utah, due to the Mormon Church, tops the list of charitable donations. The Chronicle writes, "The Mormon tradition of tithing is a primary reason residents of this state well outpace those in every other place in America. The typical household claimed charitable contributions totaling 10.6 percent of discretionary income." Faiths of all sorts can inspire giving.
 
The Washington Ethical Culture Society, a church-like group for humanists and agnostics, recently engaged in a charitable experiment. Joe Chuman, a New York Ethical Culture leader writes, "The questions Ethical Culture asks are, “How am I to look upon my fellow human beings? What should my approach to them be? How should I value them?”
 
Just before Thanksgiving, the Ethical Culture leader in DC, Mary Herman, asked her congregants to check their church programs. If they had a blue card in their program, Herman asked them to stand up. As the Washington Post writes, "there was a collective gasp of surprise" when the ten were each given an envelope containing a $100 bill. The minister's catch? The recipients needed to give the money away to “make a difference in a person’s life.”
 
What results would a similar opportunity from local religious and charitable groups produce?
 
Even a small change in our giving habits can make a big difference. Numerous quality projects are operating on close budgets.
 
Street Sights Newspaper is a wonderful resource - a print publication written by and for the homeless community in Rhode Island. From investigative reporting to poetry, it gives public voice to people who often don't have a platform. Street Sights is a completely volunteer run project, and its publication is fully supported by donations. It costs $35.00 to order a year subscription. 1/8 of an issue can be sponsored by $75.00 dollars. Individuals, individual congregations, businesses, ministers and rabbis, and the Episcopal Diocese have all chipped in at different points. If 20 people reading this purchase a subscription, the organization will receive an additional $700 to continue printing and reporting!
 
Just up North an hour on the interstate, there is a great group based in Cambridge, Barakat. Barakat is an international organization that coordinates and sponsors schools for girls in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India. The group "has grown from one school in Pakistan into an organization spread across three countries, serving more than 3,000 women and children each year." The network of schools began as a charitable brainchild of an international carpet buying business, growing from a partnership between Cambridge-based Chris Walter and Afghani-refugee Habibullah Karimi. A small donation in US dollars can have a big impact overseas.
 
Locally, private schools for working class youth like Sofia Academy, Community Prep, and San Miguel School always need volunteers and annual fund assistance, alongside alternate arts programs like New Urban Arts, RiversEdge, and City Arts.
 
Investing in Street Sights, Barakat, and Sofia Academy would certainly appear to be a more worthwhile use of funds than a $100.00 check to David Cicilline, Barry Hinckley, or an establishment candidate's house race. We are givers in this state - as a whole, more generous than most New Englanders, and, among a certain group, willing to invest a bit of cash in politics. The giving can be even more widespread, as can the recipients. By creating a wider culture of charitable investment, even in the tiniest amounts, we're promoting an environment for justice work and opportunity.
 
In a state with so many hard luck stories, a few more second chances, funded in private and public, couldn't hurt.
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

I commend this article. Here is the real fact that needs to be looked at: Out of the top 10 charitable states, the top 8 are conservatively based. 14 out of the top 20 and so on. What is the point? States that believe that the Government will take care of them (progressive states) are in the bottom. These states that demand that people replace a high power of religion with a higher power of government.

It doesn't matter if your are Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Baptist, etc these religions demand that you give back. Government says it's ok to take more. The loss of faith effects more than the individual religious organizations, it effects the whole community.

Comment #1 by Silence Dogood on 2012 12 03

the hypocrosy of the liberal base is exposed here.

the left wing wants money for every cause as long as its not out of their own pocket.

i recall the charitable contribitions of al gore and biden.. both wealthy, both senators, and their charity deducted on their tax returns was a few hundred dollars a year.

hypocrits!!!

Comment #2 by jon paycheck on 2012 12 03

The answer to the article's headline is this: They can't give more because they're hit so hard by taxes and the high cost of living.

It's a zero-sum game. If the various levels of government will reduce their appetites for taking and channeling those takings to their own special interests, people will have the means to help out more.

Comment #3 by Art West on 2012 12 03

I respectfully disagree with Mr. West. It's more of a mentality, than it is ability or capacity to donate. There is just way too much negativity in our state.
I would venture that no matter what state you are from, the general feeling is that you pay too much in taxes.
People generally give because they WANT to give. There are numerous worthy endeavors people should consider supporting. But many do not.
If RI had greater charitable support, maybe, government would not have to contribute so much. And we'd probably feel better about ourselves as well!

Comment #4 by Harold Stassen on 2012 12 03

The real difference is that when I give my $$$, I direct where and when they go. When Liberals used tax $$ to accomplish the same thing, they decide when and where my $$$ go.

Taxes (not just Federal; State, Local, District amd Property) absolutely impact how much I donate and when I donate it. Government should not be in the "charity" business.

Comment #5 by John McDougall on 2012 12 03

Well said, John.

Comment #6 by Art West on 2012 12 03

Seconded John. Short and to the point

Comment #7 by Silence Dogood on 2012 12 03




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.