$2 Billion at Stake in Binding Arbitration Battle
Thursday, June 30, 2011

Last night, the state Senate passed a binding arbitration bill for teachers, shifting the battle over to the House, which could move on the measure today.
Under current state law—which has been in place for about four decades—local fire and police contracts are subject to binding arbitration. That means that $375 million in public safety costs across the 39 cities and towns in Rhode Island are already affected by binding arbitration. But if binding arbitration is extended to teachers, an additional $1.8 billion in local spending would potentially fall under the authority of arbitrators.

In all, Rhode Island cities and towns spent $2.1 billion on police, fire, and schools in 2010, using data obtained from the Division of Municipal Finance.
“If you look at it from the perspective of who will be deciding how this money is spent … we basically would be turning over the purse strings to unelected, unaccountable arbitrators from Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Maine,” said Vincent Ragosta, an attorney who has represented city management in labor disputes, including Providence.
‘A new government of the unions’
Ragosta said arbitrators tend to favor unions over city and town administrations. Government leaders may come and go with elections, he said, while labor leaders last longer in office. As a result, he said arbitrators have an incentive to support unions in contract disputes for the simple fact that their leaders are in power longer and therefore might hire them back. “Traditionally labor arbitrators tend to be more favorable to those who employ them on a continuous basis,” Ragosta said.

Taxpayer advocates are warning that the consequence is generous arbitration awards that benefit unions, causing tax hikes across the state.
“You create a new government of the unions, by the unions, and for the unions,” Kinder said. “That is what you do when you grant binding arbitration to the unions.”
Unions: Arbitrators have to be neutral
But arbitrators aren’t the only unelected officials who have a major say in contracts, said Marc Gursky, a labor attorney who has represented fire, police, and teacher unions. He said unelected officials “routinely make decisions” in collective bargaining agreements, such as the members of the Board of Regents and the Board of Governors for Higher Education. Sometimes contract disputes are kicked into court as well, where another unelected official—a judge—makes the final call, said Paul Doughty, head of the firefighter union in Providence.
Gursky questioned the data provided by Kinder, saying he was not aware of any study that proved arbitrators are biased in favor of unions.
Both Gursky and Doughty said the selection process for an arbitrator—which is spelled out in state law—ensures fairness and neutrality.

“It really forces them to walk the middle because if they’re all management or all union the opposition strikes them,” Doughty said. “Self interest rules the world and the arbitrator’s self-interest is to be in the middle so no one strikes you.”
So just why is binding arbitration so important to unions? Without it, Gursky says there would be no end to contract disputes. With it, he said there will be more of an incentive to bargain and reach agreements. “With arbitration as least there is an end result and making it a process where it has to be relatively quick and relatively fair will result in more deals being negotiated,” he said.
Impact: RI number 1 state for fire costs
But taxpayer advocates and municipal leaders say the evidence is on their side, blaming binding arbitration for increasing costs in public safety budgets across the state.
Yesterday, Dan Beardsley, the Executive Director of the R.I. League of Cities and Towns, said binding arbitration is the reason the Rhode Island to have the highest per capita cost of fire protection and rank 14th in per capita spending on police, according to a recent study by the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council. (Click here to read the RIPEC study.)

The reason firefighter costs are so high is not necessarily because they are paid more than others or receive more benefits, said Ashley Denault, Director of Research for RIPEC. Instead, she said it’s because Rhode Island simply has a greater number of fighters. It even has more than New Jersey, she noted, which is more densely populated than the Ocean State.
The high number of firefighters is due to the sheer number of fire departments spread throughout the state as well as minimum manning requirements, according to Denault. To the extent minimum manning has been determined by binding arbitration, she said binding arbitration has indeed been a factor in the high costs of fire protection.
Doughty disputed the RIPEC study, saying the data for Rhode Island includes staff for firefighters and EMS together, unlike other states.
“It’s apples and oranges because you need to look at both of these areas,” Doughty said. “It screws the numbers up and it makes the fire service look more expensive when it’s miscalculated as compared to other states.” (Denault countered that a National Fire Protection Association study found that a majority of calls for firefighters in other states are still for medical reasons. Doughty said that still does not justify the comparison.)

Kinder pointed to 3 percent compounded cost of living adjustments and 20-year retirements as commonplace contract provisions that originated out of binding arbitration decisions. As he described it, binding arbitration set up a kind of reverse domino effect: as one union won certain benefits in the 1970s and 1980s, other communities followed suit and granted them to avoid the costs and time-consuming process of binding arbitration.
“They say, ‘Why give it away in binding arbitration? If we have to give it away, we’ll give it away,’” Kinder said. “That’s the hidden cost.”
In Cranston, binding arbitration decisions resulted in free health care for retired police and fire, annual longevity bonuses, and minimum manning requirements, according to Steve Frias, an attorney and a local historian who is writing a book about the history of the city. He said $50 million of the unfunded liability for retiree benefits can be attributed to health care. (A recent study shows the full amount of the unfunded liability to be about $81.9 million.)
“If I had to tell you the most significant development in postwar Rhode Island, it is the rise and influence of public employee unions at the local level,” Frias said.
If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.



Comments:
Jade ellis
7:48am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
Of course labor attorney Gursky is in favor. Why would he give up his meat and potatos, for bread and butter.
Phoebe Salten
8:20am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
It would be a great service to publish the vote of each Senator on this significant bill.
Lance Chappell
8:25am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
This is the beginning of the end for Rhode Island as we know it. If this bill becomes law, it will push this state into receivership. Public education as we know it will die in Rhode Island. We have all the statistics and we finish in the lower third in just about every category. The blame is placed with the public unions. This is socialism and Rhode Island appears ready to embrace it. Prepare to lose your homes to the unions as property taxes will skyrocket. The voters in this state have brought this on themselves. They didn't vote last fall and the union rank and file jammed the voter boxes with their votes. State government is bought and paid for by public unions. Your elected legislators no longer follow the taxpayers wishes as they don't vote. They follow the unions and their wishes. Because the voters don't go to the polls they will in the end, start paying for all the wish list items the unions want to dream up. The state will get plundered by the public unions because voters didn't go to the polls. This is the consequence of not voting. Pray that Speaker Fox does not schedule this bill or holds it in committee.
C B11
8:47am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
Why do we have to have Unionized public workers? Why - when their contracts come up for renewal - can't we just say "thanks, but no thanks, we've decided not to use your "company" anymore". Why are we forced to do business with the same old company that's killing us?
jack flash
9:21am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
________________________________
Only in RI, a state ranked 50th in business climate, would something like this even be considered. Are they trying to make us a 3rd world country. THESE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO GO! HOW MUCH MORE OF THIS CAN TAXPAYERS TAKE!
Edre Former
9:36am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
This is misleading and shoddy reporting --- I expect this from the BlowJo, but better from GoLocal. Figures lie and liars figure; these inflated projections compare apples to oranges, then fear-monger with arsenic.
Nick Patriarca
10:43am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
the fiscal fallout from this bill will be devestating .
why is it that elected officials can vote for bills that they directly benefit from ?
ex. sheehan is a teacher and voted yes .
the mayors , education comm. and beardlsey all are opposed due to the financial implications .
C B11
11:25am on Thursday, June 30, 2011
I agree - it's a conflict of interest and they should recluse themselves ... but then we might see just how many in the GA are beholding to the Unions instead of constituents!
john paycheck
12:31pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011
this gets places like providence, woonsocket, west warwick,etc faster to bankruptcy.
Lance Chappell
1:03pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011
The best way to describe binding arbitration is taking away the ability for your elected representative to work on your behalf as a taxpayer in contract negotiation with the unions. The police and fire personnel have been raping the taxpayers for 40 years! They have perpetual contracts along with binding arbitration. The school teachers are jealous and want the same thing. Don't think the municipal workers are not looking for this as well. There are bills in the hopper for them as well.
The teacher unions will destroy the school systems and Governor Gump will help them. He was bought and paid for by the NEA!
The House has this bill S-0794 - you have to call your representative and voice your stong opposition to this bill. You may find quite a few are already bought and paid for by the unions and will not listen to you. Rep. Dickinson is one of them. This is the big union push and it will only be the HOUSE that can stop it. If the House votes this bill through, it will destroy this state and municipal government. It's your voice that is being silenced by the public unions. Call you rep and voice your concerns!
C B11
1:20pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011
I agree, Lance, and have already called mine. One comment - you said "the teacher's union will destroy the school system"...in my opinion, IT ALREADY HAS! I think I received a pretty darn good public school education in Woonsocket - but that was 30 years ago - it's sad to see how they've lowered standards to the point that soon, a RI diploma isn't going to be worth the paper it's printed on. Very sad, indeed.
Lance Chappell
1:46pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011
Going back 30 years is almost backing up the total damage with the unions. They came on board in the late 60's. Public school system back in the late 60's still worked and you could get a good education. Today, forget about it.
Gary Arnold
8:02pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011
Get real, unions are a waste of money, reduced services, incompetent self serving management, no respect for the private citizens, just greed and corruption with our equally dismal unionized GA.
Gut them all, they are not needed nor of any value in today's world.
C B11
10:53am on Friday, July 01, 2011
Laws have been enacted to protect workers from bad employers, the EEOC was formed to protect from discrimination, OSHA for a safe work environment - in short,the Unions have done the job they were formed to do - THEY ARE NOW OBSOLETE AND NO LONGER NECESSARY! Time for them to go the way of the buggy whip .... Bye Bye!