| | Advanced Search


Gronkowski “Good to Go” Week 1—Rob Gronkowski told reporters at Gillette Stadium that…

Russell Moore: Experience Makes Caprio a No-Brainer for Treasurer—Let's face it: politics is strange business.

Smart Benefits: Two Regs Issued on Contraceptive Coverage—Two regulations on contraceptive coverage were recently issued…

Peace Flag Project to Host Rhode Island Month of Peace in September—The Peace Flag Project will host over 30…

Don’t Miss: Fall Newport Secret Garden Tours—The Benefactors of the Arts will present a…

Fall Activities for the Whole Family—Mark your calendars for the best activities of…

Skywatching: Seagrave Memorial Observatory Centennial (1914-2014)—Skyscrapers, Inc., the Amateur Astronomical Society of Rhode…

Friday Financial Five - August 29, 2014—The Tax Foundation has put together a helpful…

RI Resource Recovery Collected 6K Pounds of Clothes—RI Resource Recovery has received more than 6,000…

5 Live Music Musts - August 29, 2014—We’ve got Rhythm and Roots and a whole…


Bankrupt Central Falls Doled Out Raises To City Workers

Thursday, April 04, 2013


Despite deep cuts in pensions and other benefits, Central Falls employees will emerge from municipal bankruptcy later this month with something that is practically unheard of in the world of bankruptcies: raises.

“Raises are more unusual,” said James Spiotto, a Chicago-based attorney and a national expert in corporate and municipal bankruptcy. “That’s an interesting twist.”

A review of the contracts negotiated while Central Falls was very much in the throes of the bankruptcy process reveals that the three major unions—firefighters, police, and other city workers affiliated with AFSCME Council 94—are set to receive on average 2.5 percent annual raises until 2016, when the contracts expire. The first round of raises took effect in July 2012. (See below tables for examples.)

The base salary of a Central Falls employee is also higher now than it was before the city entered municipal bankruptcy in August 2011. The average base city salary at the time was $41,650. As the city neared the end of the process, one year later, the average base stood at $47,500, according to Gayle Corrigan, the chief of staff for the state-appointed receiver.

Raises called unfair

A leading taxpayer advocate called the raises unfair, given the sacrifices being made elsewhere in the city.

“While the residents of Central Falls suffer through a bankruptcy proceeding, struggle to repay the costs incurred from the bankruptcy itself, and lose a significant amount of equity in their homes, and while the Central Falls retirees have their pension slashed in half, it doesn’t seem that economic justice is served when working firefighters, police officers and city workers receive guaranteed raises averaging 2.5 percent a year over the next four years,” said Lisa Blais, spokesperson for OSTPA, a Tea Party organization.

Blais said the salary hikes raise the question of whether Central Taxpayers are also receiving raises in this economy.

For local property owners, their tax rates, at least, will increase by 4 percent annually over the next four years while a 55-percent slash in pension income takes effect for many retirees. The city workforce has also been shrunk from a pre-bankruptcy level of 174 to 117, as of this week, according to Corrigan.

In separate interviews, former receiver Robert Flanders and union officials said the raises were instituted as an incentive to keep city workers from leaving as a result of the numerous benefit cuts they took.

But taxpayer advocates said they remained unconvinced the raises were justified. Mike Stenhouse, the CEO of the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity, said the raises were one example of the broad inequity between public and private sector pay found in a recent study the center issued. “We all want the government that works for all Rhode Islanders, not just some,” Stenhouse said. “I think this raise plays to that emotion.”

Officials: ‘Only half the story’

But officials who were on both sides of the contract negotiations said the raises had to be considered in the broad context of the deep cuts being made elsewhere in employee compensation.

“I think the opposite side of that story is there were cuts to each employee that were significant impacts to each employee’s life,” said Mike Andrews, the head of the city firefighter union, IAFF Local 1485. “To say that we got raises and that we made out I think is a misleading statement.”

Flanders largely agreed. “When you say they got raises, you have to put that in the context of what else why gave up,” he said.

The cuts were so severe that employees almost needed raises just to survive financially, said Michael Downey, president of Council 94.

Most severe were the changes to health care and retirement benefits. For firefighters, deductibles doubled from $2,000 to $4,000 for families and $1,000 to $2,000 for individuals—although city deposits into health savings accounts offset some of that. Co-pays went from 12 percent to 20 percent. And new rules on retirement mean that firefighters can’t retire before 57 and must have worked 25 years. Before, they could retire after 20 years at any age.

Other benefit reductions for firefighters included: dropping the annual clothing allowance from $1,800 to $1,000, eliminating the $10 per shift stipend for riding along on ambulance rescue runs, ending the $1,500 stipend for those who had EMT cardiac licenses, cutting two holidays, and shifting longevity pay from a percentage to a flat amount that cost firefighters anywhere from $500 to $1,000 annually, according to Andrews.

John Burns, the lead negotiator for AFSCME Local 1627, echoed those sentiments. “There were deep cuts,” he said, ticking off concessions on vacation pay, sick time, holidays, and health insurance.

Flanders and Corrigan pointed to other changes as well—the problem with disability pensions, in particular.

At one time, approximately 60 percent of firefighters and police officers were retiring on disability pensions, according to Corrigan. She said it was actually current employees who had taken the lead in proposing stricter rules on disability pensions. Those include distinctions between total and partial disabilities and counting out hypertension as a disability if it can be controlled with medication.

Cost of the raises

Blais said the pay raises beg two other questions: Do they exceed the $2 million that statewide taxpayers are contributing to the city budget? And, what are the costs of the new contracts compared to the old ones, before the bankruptcy?

Andrews said he was certain the total compensation of his members—once raises are weighed against all the cuts—had dropped overall, as compared with their compensation before the bankruptcy. Corrigan said she agreed. But neither was able to provide direct figures on the total differences in compensation.

When the contracts were settled, Corrigan said she had not done an independent analysis of the cost of the new agreements against the old ones. At the time, she said the paramount concern of the receiver’s office was the big picture: bringing the city to a point where its budget was balanced. By the end of fiscal year 2012, that had been achieved, according to Corrigan.

The dramatic restructuring that city departments underwent only further frustrates efforts to make independent assessments of the cost of the new contracts. For example, in fiscal year 2010, the budget for the Police Department was $2.8 million, according to the audited financial statements for the city. In the current year, the budget is $3.2 million.

But Corrigan said the Police Department is different today. She noted that it absorbed dispatch services, which previously were not included in the police budget.

She said it’s easier to make apple-to-apple comparisons in other areas, like overtime. And there records indeed show a significant decrease. In 2010, Central Falls budgeted $100,000 for firefighter overtime but ended up spending $408,000. In 2012, overtime had dropped to $116,974, according to Corrigan.

Reasons for the raises

Flanders said one of the issues he faced as the receiver for the city was how to retain a workforce with “radically different pensions.” He said he was committed to not compromising public safety in the process and said he was pleased that the city had been able to strike agreements with the fire and police unions, rather than outsourcing those services—an idea that was once considered by his office.

He also considers it an achievement that the city was able to reach agreements that eliminated so many abuses in the budget, such as overtime and disability pensions. On balance, he said the contracts were a “very favorable deal” for the city.

As it is, turnover is still high in the Fire Department, Andrews said. But without the raises, he suspects it would have been even higher.

He pointed to another reason for the raises. Before bankruptcy, he said Central Falls firefighters were the lowest paid among municipal fire departments in the state—a statement with which Corrigan said she agreed.

Burns said the raises emerged during the negotiating process. The specific 2.5 percent figure, he added, was put forward by the receiver’s negotiators.

A precedent for other communities?

The outcome of the Central Falls bankruptcy could set a precedent for others, especially any Rhode Island cities on the edge of the fiscal abyss.

Prior to Central Falls, the most notable municipal bankruptcy was Vallejo, in California, which filed in 2008. Unlike Central Falls, Spiotto said that he believes city employees in Vallejo did not emerge from bankruptcy with raises.

But Vallejo was still in the midst of bankruptcy when Central Falls went broke. “That precedent wasn’t available to us,” Flanders said. “We didn’t really have precedents to look to in terms of other communities.”

And Flanders added, Vallejo did not go after pensions to the same extent that Central Falls did.

“This really was terra incognita for all of us,” he said.

Stephen Beale can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @bealenews


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


people of RI deserve being treated like aholes..we elect them, appoint them, tolerate them..we are SUCKERS FOR PUNISHMENT

Comment #1 by frank bentley on 2013 04 04

Typical Rhode Island way of solving a problem, keep intact the one of the main reasons the tiny city collapsed in the first place. Stopping short of scuttling the contracts will come back to haunt Central Falls.

Comment #2 by David Beagle on 2013 04 04

Did GoLocal get bought out by Lisa Blais and Ken Block?

Comment #3 by Malachi Constant on 2013 04 04

The public unions in RI ARE THE problem.
Privatize it all, consolidate small cities into regional blocks, and watch the costs go down and quality of service go up.

Comment #4 by Captain Blacksocks on 2013 04 04

Obviously, everyone hates public employees and believe that they should work for free or should all be fired and replaced with McDonalds-type staff making minimum wage. However, four years from now CF city employees will make 10% more than they did last year. The clerk making $32k a year will make $35k.

Since we hate public employees we are convinced that they will use that raise to buy a second set of Callaway Big Berthas, spend a weekend in paris or trade in their two year old BMW for a new one.

For most of those 117 employees, however, those extra $3k over four years won't even cover the additional expense of their larger (and ever-increasing) health care co-pay.

Are they lucky to still have a job? Absolutely. 57 of their colleagues weren't so lucky.

Comment #5 by Edward Smith on 2013 04 04

The only reason that Central Falls went bankrupt was that over a twenty year period 1991-2010 they raised property taxes by a total of 23%.

Meanwhile the average for the rest of RI's communities was 135% over that same time period.

Further the new State school funding formula which looks at property values, incomes, and how many kids are on the free lunch program states that Central Falls can afford to pay $12 million a year towards their school funding yet they continue to pay ZERO.

Total scam on the rest of RI taxpayers.

Comment #6 by Jim D on 2013 04 04

Sometimes it seems we are just hopelessly outnumbered by the takers and the crooks.

Comment #7 by James Berling on 2013 04 04

It reminds me of what Reagan said:
“Government is not the solution to our problems. Government IS the problem.”

Comment #8 by James Berling on 2013 04 04

Yup. I think Reagan also said the scariest statement is:
"I'm from the government and I'm here to help you."

Comment #9 by Captain Blacksocks on 2013 04 04

Ed, I don't think anyone hates public/union employees. It's just a little hard to understand how a City is bankrupt yet able to give any raises to anyone. The raises should be zero until the City is financially stable. If the public employees don't think that's fair...well guess what?...lots of unfair things happen to employees everyday in the public sector. If they complain about it, the RI employee will quickly remind the employee that RI is an "employment at will" state and any unhappy employee can just leave and work elsewhere. Public employees in bankrupt towns should get no rasies at all, and if they don't like it, they should join the rest of us in private labor market.

Comment #10 by Captain Blacksocks on 2013 04 04

I meant to write...

lots of unfair things happen to employees everyday in the PRIVATE sector.

Comment #11 by Captain Blacksocks on 2013 04 04

After reading this report it just states the the reorg by the bankruptcy cut much of the waste and wrong benefits that were being received. The people being cut can say they were hurt, but then again they did not deserve what they were getting in the first place.
Flanders and company did not handle the raise correctly and making the compromise statements is just a wash over a mistake.
It is time to outsource to the fire, police and muni workers.
The schools are the same, time to put education into professional hands that get paid by performance.

Comment #12 by Gary Arnold on 2013 04 04

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.