Anyone Can Tape You
Friday, May 02, 2014
“Folks should realize that anyone can tape you,” said former Attorney General Arlene Violet.
“Lots of recorded conversations are done for purposes of divorce. Folks need to be reminded that anything they say over a phone can be used against them so they need to be mindful that they could be recorded.”
Rhode Island is among the majority of states that require single-party consent for recording of telephone conversations. State law expressly allows the recording and disclosure of the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication by a party to the communication or with the prior consent of one of the parties, so long as no criminal or tortious purpose exists. Under the statute, consent is not required for the taping of a non-electronic communication uttered by a person who does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that communication.
"RI’s one-party law is like the majority of states. It is also federal law, governing interstate calls. The philosophy behind these laws is that we all take the risk that anyone with whom we have a private conversation will remember the conversation or take notes and blab about it. If a person with whom we have a conversation records it, at least it will be an accurate rendition," said Robert Ellis Smith, Publisher of The Privacy Journal.
Business related calls
Ellis said Massachusetts and Connecticut have two-party consent law He also said there is a stipulation in Rhode Island law regarding businesses.
"Generally in these one- and two-party states, businesses may record business-related calls without consent, but not the part of a conversation that is clearly personal. The Sterling case should also remind us that these laws apply to in-person tape-recording as well as interception or recording of a telephone call."
It is almost always illegal to record a phone call or conversation to which you are not a party. Vermont is the only state with no criminal penalties for unlawful recording.
In Rhode Island, illegal recording – or disclosing with reason to know of the illegal recording – carries a criminal penalty of not more than five years in prison, but no penalty can be imposed if the contents of the intercepted communication have become “common knowledge or public information.” Civil liability is authorized for actual damages, $100 for each day of violation or $1,000 — whichever is greater. Punitive damages, attorney fees and litigation costs also are authorized. (R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-5.1-13.)
RI criminal case involving wiretapping
“There are numerous criminal cases of taping conversations,” Violet said.
One of those cases dates back to 1979 – The State of Rhode Island vs. Frank “Bobo” Marrapese. Marrapese is one of the state’s most notorious mob figures. While on parole for murder, he was recently sentenced to nine years in state prison for racketeering conspiracy, extortion conspiracy and criminal usury charges. His place in Rhode Island taping consent law seems quaint in comparison.
“He was convicted of stealing a camper and selling stolen autos. Initially, he arranged for an associate to steal a camper to take him and his girlfriend, Vivian, to Florida to catch some rays,” Violet said.
More states are starting to move towards laws similar to those here in Rhode Island. Like California, Illinois was one of the few states to require the consent of all parties in a recorded conversation. The Illinois State Supreme Court recently declared Illinois’ “eavesdropping” statute to be unconstitutional. Chief Justice Rita Garman wrote this for the court:
“Audio and audiovisual recordings are medias of expression commonly used for the preservation and dissemination of information and ideas, and thus are included within the free speech and free press guarantees of the first and fourteenth amendments. The act of making such a recording is necessarily included in the first amendment’s guarantee of speech and press rights as a corollary of the right to disseminate the resulting recording.”
- EXCLUSIVE: Secret Recording in Brown Rape Case
- Violet: Watson Should Resign Leadership Post
- Don Roach: NSA Warrantless Surveillance The Beginning of the End
- INVESTIGATION: Brown Rape Case
- NEW: Missing Brown Student’s Family Releases Surveillance Evidence
- Arlene Violet’s Mob Musical “The Family” Tickets Going on Sale
- Russ Moore: Langevin’s Mature Approach To Domestic Surveillance
- Landfill Investigation: Former AG Arlene Violet Rips Lynch for Not Pressing Charges
- Brown Rape Case Recording - Part 1
- The Mob and Me: Arlene Violet and the Convent Connection
- Brown Rape Case Recording - Part 2
- The Mob and Me: Arlene Violet at the Cathedral
- Brown Rape Case Recording - Part 3
- The Mob and Me: Arlene Violet on Federal Hill
- Brown Rape Case: Top Stories in RI in 2012
- Theater Review: Arlene Violet’s Mob Musical, The Family