ACLU Calls for Answers Before Providence Police Deploy Body Cameras
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Concerns they express include the officer's ability to turn the cameras on and off and the release of body camera footage.
“While body cameras can benefit the public and law enforcement by bringing much-needed transparency to policing, the policy we understand is currently in use by the Providence Police Department will serve only to shroud body camera footage in secrecy and raise serious questions as to the discretion used by law enforcement in activating the cameras. These questions must be resolved before the start of any widespread body camera program.
Under this policy, police have broad discretion in when to turn the cameras on and off, allowing for law enforcement to choose to turn body cameras on after an incident has commenced and the body cameras can no longer shed much-needed light on a situation. Beyond immediate officer safety concerns, any subjectivity in decisions to turn body cameras on or off raises concerns about what is not being captured by cameras, and why. While the policy encompasses many of the instances in which a body camera should be activated, unintentional gaps in the ‘Body Worn Camera Activation Parameters’ leave law enforcement open to allegations of subjective body camera use and may fail to capture many of the instances in which body cameras may be most helpful.
Further, the policy lacks clear guidance as to the release of body camera footage. Particularly in light of recent events in Charlotte, North Carolina and the controversy surrounding release of footage in other municipalities using body cameras, it is imperative that any body camera policy clearly allow for the release of footage to the public, without delay. The greatest benefit of body cameras to the public is that of transparency in policing – a benefit that is denied to the public if the Providence Police Department can choose to deny access to these videos.
The ACLU of Rhode Island calls on the Providence Police Department to publicly promulgate a new policy for the use of body cameras, with these concerns taken into account.”
- NEW: RI ACLU Defends Sex Offenders Against Law Forcing Them to Move
- Homeland Security Test at T.F. Green Opposed by RI ACLU
- NEW: RI ACLU “Deeply Troubled” by Pawtucket Protests and Arrests
- ACLU Files Lawsuit Challenging Residency Restriction of Sex Offenders
- NEW: Harmony Fire District Charged With Sex Discrimination by RI ACLU
- RI ACLU Asks Cranston City Council to Further Investigate Police Practices
- RI ACLU Asks Fung for Full Report on Cranston Police Dept. Investigation
- New ACLU Report: Racial Disparities In RI School Suspensions Highest in Decade
- ACLU of RI Files Lawsuit That Challenges 106-Year-Old Statute
- ACLU of RI Supports Supreme Court Decision On Hotels Giving Police Guest Lists
- NEW: Providence Sued by ACLU Over Musician’s Ability to Play in Public
- NEW: ACLU Reports RI Public Schools Handed Out 12,682 Suspensions Last Year
- ACLU Claims U.S. is Illegally Detaining U.S. Citizens
- NEW: Mattiello Disappointed in Raimondo’s Veto of “Revenge Porn” Bill, ACLU Applauds Action
- ACLU Says Prov Officials’ Attempt to Block Church Services in Burnside Park is Unconstitutional
- RI ACLU Says Westerly Yacht Club’s Actions Violate “State’s Civil Rights Act & RI Laws”
- RI ACLU Disappointed Ethics Commission Voted to Uphold Complaint Moratorium
- Common Cause, League of Women Voters, ACLU Call on Kilmartin to Release 38 Studios Records
- RI ACLU Files Suit Against Prov Ordinance Prohibiting 3+ College Students Living Together
- RI ACLU Finds Multiple Violations of Open Meetings Act
- ACLU Sues Tiverton, Says 3rd Grader Arrested Without Cause
- RI ACLU Blasts Barrington Police for Arresting Kids as Young as 12
- ACLU, Groups Demand to See RI State Police Report on Tolman Officer