Aaron Regunberg: Corporate ‘Reform’ Alienating Teachers/Principals
Friday, March 01, 2013

Aaron Regunberg argues that higher stress levels and lower job satisfaction rates are making educators miserable.
The Metlife Survey of the American Teacher recently released a report from their 2012 investigation into the state of U.S. educators. The annual survey, which was conducted among 1,000 K-12 public school teachers and 500 K-12 public school principals, offers an invaluable snapshot of the condition of those professionals to whom we entrust the educating of our nation’s youth. This year’s results continue a disturbing—and an escalating—trend that should have all of us seriously reconsidering what kinds of strategies will actually, positively reform our education system.
The number one loudest alarm bell I saw in the survey were the findings on educators’ job satisfaction. According to the study, “Principal and teacher job satisfaction is declining. Principals’ satisfaction with their jobs in the public schools has decreased nine percentage points since it was last measured in 2008. In that same period, teacher satisfaction has dropped precipitously by 23 percentage points, including a five-point decrease in the last year, to the lowest level it has been in the survey in 25 years.”
And that is not all: “A majority of teachers report that they feel under great stress at least several days a week, a significant increase from 1985 when this was last measured… Stress is related to job satisfaction for teachers. Teachers today with lower job satisfaction are more than twice as likely as those who say they are very satisfied with their job to feel under great stress several days a week or more (65% vs. 28%).”
Unsurprisingly, these trends are not evenly distributed, with educators at low-performing schools and schools that have had budget cuts reporting more stress and dissatisfaction.
“Principals and teachers with low job satisfaction report higher levels of stress than do other educators and are more likely to work in high-needs schools,” the report said. “Less satisfied principals are more likely to find it challenging to maintain an academically rigorous environment and an adequate supply of effective teachers in their schools, while less satisfied teachers are more likely to be working in schools where budgets and time for professional development and collaboration have decreased in the last 12 months.”
It is difficult to over-stress the significance of these findings. This kind of decline in job satisfaction—23 percentage points in four years—is shocking, and I don’t know how one could argue that such a development would not have major effects on students’ academic experiences. While a little stress is acceptable (maybe even helpful) in challenging us to strive, do any of us perform best in our profession when we are highly stressed? Do any of us work harder and more effectively when we are decidedly dissatisfied with our jobs? Of course we don’t, and I would argue that it would be even harder to defy these normal rules of behavior in a job as complex and difficult as that of a teacher or principal.
In essence, this survey shows that we are actively chasing away the very people who are most responsible for the direct implementation of our young people’s schooling. This is not a trivial development. Research shows—and, indeed, it should be self-evident—that school reform efforts hinge on teacher buy-in. It doesn’t matter what kind of turnaround plan you may have concocted; you simply cannot improve a school’s performance if the rank-and-file educators who will be enacting this plan are not invested in and taking ownership of the initiative.
So what’s the lesson of all this? We have to stop doing everything in our power to make teachers hate their jobs, whether it is taking away their freedom to be creative in their own classrooms; forcing them to spend their days teaching to a standardized test; labeling them “ineffective” and even firing them based on faulty evaluation models; hyping movies like Waiting for Superman or Won’t Back Down that actively blame teachers for all the problems facing public education; highlighting programs like Teach For America whose underlying premise is that career teachers need to be replaced by temporary, untrained elite college grads; or any of the dozens of other ways we de-professionalize, constrain, and devalue our nation’s educators.
Our public schools are failing to properly serve low-income students. But we are not going to fix this titanic and complicated dilemma by making students’ teachers miserable, and we need to recognize this truth and course-correct if we are to begin making substantial progress towards ensuring every young person gets the relevant, engaging and high-quality education he or she deserves.
Related Articles
- Aaron Regunberg: A Closer Look at Raimondomania
- Aaron Regunberg: A Rhode Island Teaching Fellow Speaks Out
- Aaron Regunberg: A Tale of Two Foxes
- Aaron Regunberg: AK-47s Don’t Kill People, Single Mothers Kill People, Apparently
- Aaron Regunberg: Corporate ‘Reform’ Alienating Teachers/Principals
- Aaron Regunberg: Don’t Close the Pawtucket Network RI Office
- Aaron Regunberg: Don’t Kill the Postal Service
- Aaron Regunberg: Education’s False Proxy Trap
- Aaron Regunberg: How Walmart Workers Could Save the U.S. Economy
- Aaron Regunberg: New Education Film is ‘Shamelessly Manipulative’
- Aaron Regunberg: Pay-to-play a loser for RI students
- Aaron Regunberg: Providence Can Learn from Chicago Teachers Strike
- Aaron Regunberg: RI Needs a Modern Day Works Progress Administration
- Aaron Regunberg: RI-CAN Shows its True Colors
- Aaron Regunberg: Republicans Did Not Build That
- Aaron Regunberg: Rhode Island Teachers, Stand Up!
- Aaron Regunberg: Tax Cuts for Wealthy Don’t Spur Growth
- Aaron Regunberg: Teacher Intimidation is a Myth, Right?
- Aaron Regunberg: The GOP is a Flawed Product
- Aaron Regunberg: The Loss of an Incredible Soul
- Aaron Regunberg: The Real Story of Rosa Parks
- Aaron Regunberg: The Terrible Cost of High-Stakes Testing
- Aaron Regunberg: Walmart Organizing Could Represent New Economic Era
- Aaron Regunberg: Want Economic Development? Raise the Minimum Wage
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.



Comments:
Odd Job
3:55am on Friday, March 01, 2013
Binding arbitration is alienating taxpayers!
C B11
9:33am on Friday, March 01, 2013
If they're so miserable in their job, they can do what we in the private sector do: QUIT AND FIND ONE YOU'RE HAPPY WITH!
Aaron Regunberg
9:48am on Friday, March 01, 2013
C B11, funny you should mention that. This year's survey didn't ask this question, but last year's MetLife survey found that 29% of teachers are planning to leave the profession in the next 5 years. That is an unsustainable number. So yes, that is exactly what is happening, and experts predict it is going to be a huge problem in the long term.
By the way, the hyperlink didn't go through, here is the survey for folks who want to look at it in depth:
https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/foundation/MetLife-Teacher-Survey-2012.pdf
Art West
10:13am on Friday, March 01, 2013
I totally understand that anyone has to love what they do in their professional life, and that creativity is a huge part of it.
So, I'd say to teachers: Okay, let the creativity flow; get the kids engaged and learning because of your enthusiasm. If it works, and your performance results in better educated kids who gain real knowledge that prepares them for the real world, and they score better on tests, then thank you and keep it up and take satisfaction in your accomplishment.
If the above does not work, and the teacher is bummed out all the time, I'd advise the teacher to find another line of work.
Russ C
12:45pm on Friday, March 01, 2013
What a shock, eh? See Deming's 12th point.
Michael Trenn
7:52pm on Friday, March 01, 2013
Am I missing something here? Where does the "Corporate Reform" figure in to the teacher stress, except in your conclusions? Reform efforts are not singled out until you assign a cause for teacher/principal dissatisfaction. Did you have your answer before you started reviewing this study?
Ed Jucation
8:25am on Monday, March 04, 2013
The blatant ignorance of some people's comments never cease to amaze me, especially considering they have not been inside an urban public school in years. Art West states "Let your creativity flow". I wish I could Art but I must follow one model of teaching, the workshop model. In this model there is no flexibility: videos cannot be used, students must sit in groups (where all they do is talk and socialize). This model of teaching may be effective for one particular lesson but not as the sole method of teaching every day. I do not have the authority to teach as I see fit. Principals are more concerned with teachers having the lesson objective pasted on the walls as well as student work and vocabulary words. We're told WHAT to teach, WHEN to teach it and HOW to teach it. Not much room for creativity. Such a joke but you wouldn't know these details because you have not been inside a school to witness this first hand and neither has C B11.