| | Advanced Search


Brown Football Opens Camp With Many Holes To Fill—Bears report to training camp on Thursday

Tax Breaks for Developers - See the Special Deals—See the special deals and millions in tax…

Hodgson Names Gobeil as Campaign Manager—Republican candidate for Attorney General Dawson Hodgson has…

Block Calls on Fung to Explain His Role in Cranston Police Scandals—Republican candidate for Governor Ken Block has called…

Progressive Democrats Of Rhode Island Endorse Clay Pell for Governor—The Rhode Island Progressive Democrats of America (RIPDA)have…

Rhode Island’s 5 Best Cooking Classes—Most parents we know consider this -- back…

Patriots Roster Projections 2.0—Who makes the cut? Who gets cut? Find…

Ric Santurri: Solomon – Do As I Say, Not As I Do—As the Democratic primary for Mayor of Providence…

LISTEN: 72% of 2014 Gubernatorial Campaign Expenditures Spent Out of State—While each candidate for Governor talks about creating…

Gary Sasse: Are Gubernational Candidates Being Realistic and Focused?—As Rhode Island enters the homestretch of the…


Historic East Side Development Fails City Inspection

Saturday, March 15, 2014


Renovations at 200 Hope Street recently failed a surprise City inspection

Renovations at the historic Lippitt House at 200 Hope Street failed a surprise city inspection on Friday, following the third stop-work order issued by the city this week for work on the property, which had been lifted on Thursday.

Last week, GoLocal reported that neighbors, as well as community groups and leaders including the Providence Preservation Society and City Councilman Sam Zurier, had been voicing concerns both of the scope of the renovation project, as well as the process.

See Inspection Report HERE

"We conducted an inspection at 9 AM [Friday] morning," said Tony Carvalho, Building Official with the Department of Inspections and Standards. "We found a bunch of things, which they need to correct. It depends on the job, but if you look hard enough, you're going to find something."

Carvalho had recently sent a letter to 200 Hope Street developer David Baskin entitled "unsafe conditions - structural columns basement area," which had prompted a stop-work order, that was lifted on Thursday.

Neighbors Monitoring Process

Carvalho's letter to Baskin took issue with a deviation of the designed structural details in the the original plans as submitted -- which had called for reinforced steel in the basement construction.

Neighbors raised issues with the city when they said they never saw any steel being delivered, rather laminated wood posts that that feared could compromise the historical building's structural integrity.

"I noticed last week that the developers lawyer said there wouldn't be any structural changes to the outside of the property, but there are visible PVC pipes now that weren't there before," said neighboring resident Dawn Robertson. "My office is right next to the parking area, as is my dining room, and living room. A steel delivery would require large trucks and traffic to be stopped -- I have clients who work with steel fabrication, I know what they look like. I asked the City inspector if it was safe, and met code, and I was told it did."

Robertson continued, "My fantasy is that there should be a checklist, for both the contractor and the city, to make this a transparent process. I moved here from Connecticut, where what's happening here just doesn't happen there. I've called an expert on zoning and enforcement from Connecticut to walk me through the process. I'm meeting with someone Monday at Common Cause about this."

"I just want some clarity, to get the bigger picture," said Robertson. "I think this a bigger issue than 200 Hope Street. I want it that so that normal people who aren't developers understand the process."

Housing Court Potential

Both Robertson and Carvalho said there would be potential for the issue to be taken up in Housing Court.

"Tony Carvahlo said what [the neighbors] should do is go to Housing Court, but I don't know how they schedule these things, or how we even find out," said Robertson.

Carvahlo said the likelihood that developer Baskin would end up in housing court was high. "This should be headed to Housing Court because [Baskin] violated stop work order. We're keeping him on a tight leash now. I'm having a hard time keeping him in line. He does good work, but he's running fast and loose," said Carvalho.

Baskin's lawyer John Garrahy with Moses, Afonso, and Ryan, said Friday afternoon he had not heard about the failed inspection.

"I know there was a recent stop work order that was lifted," said Garrahy. "And I know there was a violation of a stop work order previously. The usual course of action is to go to [housing] court with respect to these violations."   


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


All that time and effort spent watching someone else's property, looking to make trouble for them? We have them here, too. They're in your neighborhood. They infested mine years ago.

Entirely too much time on their hands, and the inability to mind their own business.

Comment #1 by paul zecchino on 2014 03 15

you don't have to wonder why nobody wants the 195 land.

here's a good idea. let a non profit buy the profit and keep it the way it is and have it be tax exempt!!

Comment #2 by john paycheck on 2014 03 15

'Visible PVC pipes' are not 'structural changes' to a building. Most likely a sign of high efficiency furnaces/boilers being used. Wow, can't have that I guess.

So the nosy neighbors and the nosy PPC have had the construction halted temporarily.

They are going to be simmering for years once this is finished.

Comment #3 by Jim D on 2014 03 16

According to the "Stop Work Order" the contractor was not following the approved plans. If something occurred and there and there was a collapse, we would complain that the inspector didn't do due diligence in inspecting the work, to make sure it conformed to the approved plans.

Did anyone complaining now, complain about the Station Night Club inspector?
We can't have it both ways.

Comment #4 by Wuggly Ump on 2014 03 16

This is not about safety at all it's about the neighbors and the PPC not wanting student housing there.

When this is finished and there are no issues the neighbors and the PPC will still be complaining. The report states NOTHING about structural steel - it does mentions columns most likely lally columns.

I live inside a Historic District and they want to tell you how to maintain your property - what you can do with YOUR property. Inside & out.

NOTHING in the report alludes to some huge truck carrying 'structural steel being needed here. I think that neighbor is hallucinating.

Columns added to beams. - this is not a work stopper

Gang beams need to be through bolted. - this is not a work stopper

Need detail on egress windows, not built to approved plans. No detail on this some sort of emergency exist through the windows?

Proper clearance not provided not provided at boilers. - since there isn't a picture of the boilers in the report or of the pvc venting/intake I'm not sure if that means the vent/intake is too close to a structure outside or ?

Comment #5 by Jim D on 2014 03 16

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.