One-in-Three Providence Kids Live in Poverty, Report Says
Friday, June 22, 2012
Nearly 15,000 Providence children lived in families with incomes below the federal poverty level between 2006 and 2010, according to a report from Rhode Island Kids Count.
The striking statistics will be discussed today when community leaders gather for a presentation at Central High School.
Between 2006 and 2010, more than one in three children in Providence (35.6% or 14,921 children) lived in families with incomes below the federal poverty level ($18,123 for a family of three with two children and $22,811 for a family of four with two children). During that same time period, one in six children in Providence (16.8% or 7,054 children) lived in families in extreme poverty, with incomes less than one-half the federal poverty level ($9,062 for a family of three with two children and $11,406 for a family of four with two children).
Communities with high poverty rates, like Providence, tend to have poorer infant health outcomes than more advantaged communities. In fact, Providence has the highest percentage of women receiving delayed prenatal care in the state. The percentage of mothers receiving delayed prenatal care or no prenatal care has increased from 12.0% in 2001-2005 to 22.9% in 2006-2010. Providence also has the highest preterm birth rate in the state, and higher low birthweight and infant mortality rates than the state as a whole.
“Early prenatal care is important to identify and treat health problems and influence health behaviors that can hurt infant and maternal health,” noted Bryant. “Increasing access to health insurance can help improve outcomes for mothers and their babies. Low-income women with Medicaid coverage are more likely to have timely prenatal care than women who are uninsured, so it is important to continue to maintain and protect programs like RIte Care, the state’s Medicaid managed care health program, which provides access to health care for Rhode Island’s children and families.” Mobility, chronic absenteeism high among Providence students
A higher percentage of Providence school children changed schools during the 2010- 2011 school year than any other district in the state. During that time period, one in four (25%) Providence children changed schools, compared to the state rate of 14%.
According to Geller, “Children who change schools often miss learning critical concepts and skills and therefore are likely to have lower math and reading skills than children who do not change schools. Entire schools are also affected, because when large numbers of students move in and out of classrooms, teachers must slow down their teaching and address changing classroom dynamics and student needs.”
Providence also has a very high rate of chronic early absence, the percentage of children in kindergarten through third grade who have missed at least 10% of the school year (i.e. 18 days or more). During the 2010-2011 school year, more than one in five (22%) Providence children in grades K-3 were chronically absent, almost twice the state rate of 12% and the second highest rate of chronic absenteeism in Rhode Island.
“Chronic absenteeism is often caused by a combination of factors – including poverty, teenage parenting, poor maternal health, poor quality education, bullying and disruptive classrooms. It can be reduced through school, family and community partnerships that use an ongoing and intentional approach for monitoring attendance and by contacting parents as soon as troubling patterns of attendance appear,” said Bryant.
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Comments:
barnaby morse
7:45am on Friday, June 22, 2012
Certainly hope Gist reads this.
pearl fanch
11:03am on Friday, June 22, 2012
I want to start by saying that it truly is sad that this many children are living in poverty.
Then I’d like to ask, what will be discussed at this meeting with “community leaders”?
I can tell you what SHOULD be discussed.
One would be, for children to stop having children, (which means, stop having sex) because they’re too stupid to rely on any type of birth control.
Two would be, adults who can’t afford to raise your children on your own, should stop having children. I know this doesn’t apply to all cases, but if you’re on welfare and are continuing to have children (primarily to stay on welfare) then you need to stop. It’s not anyone else’s responsibility to raise and support your child but your’s.
Three, how many of these children of poverty are coming from broken homes? Either by parents never being married in the first place, or getting divorced afterwards? Society needs to change, because this simply is not acceptable.
Four, once the parents are divorced, is the father (or mother) paying their share of child support for the child?
Our society is crashing and burning all around us, and that’s what needs to be fixed before anything will change. If we continue to allow this type of action to take place, things will only get worse. The numbers will only grow.
The parents of these children need to take on the responsibility and not rely on government programs to support them. Throwing money at this type of problem is NOT the answer.
Todd B
11:32am on Friday, June 22, 2012
Providence voluntarily became a sanctuary city. Now people are surprised that 1 in 3 kids live in poverty? Really?
Michael Trenn
9:02am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Mr. Morse, it is not Commissioner Gist who should read this, but rather the Governot.Gordon Fox should read it, along with Paiva-Weed. Reed, Langevin, Weldon, and Congressmistake ChiChi should read it too. Then they should resign from office, so that more competent people can take their jobs. They are all millionaires, so they can take some time off.