195 Commission Chair Defends Lack of Progress on Jobs, Construction
Monday, December 12, 2016
A rendering of a portion of the Wexford proposal, which is still going through the channels with the 195 Commission and the state.
Current commission Chair Joe Azrack, however, is defending the speed of development, and future prospects for the more than 26 acres of land in Providence.
“Whether it’s Providence or Boston, or really any metropolitan area when you’re talking about urban redevelopment of large scale - and 27 acres is a large scale redevelopment - it’s complicated," said Azrack. "It takes a long time to do everything from various legislative steps that have to happen at state or city level, to clearing the site to putting utilities and infrastructure in and then getting interest."
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST“So it’s frustrating I think, on a personal level - not for me, but people who are observing this,” said Azrack. “But the nature of the work that’s being done, and you can look around — the Seaport, which took ten years to get going up in Boston, it took a while.”
Five Years Later
In 2010, Providence Mayoral candidates were offering their plans for the 195 land. Neighbors opposed the creation of a state-appointed 195 Commission in the summer of 2011, and the Rhode Island Senate confirmed the first set of commissioners that fall.
A year and a half later in April 2013, preparation work began when the RI-DOT transferred the land to the Commission. In January 2014, GoLocal asked, “Is Rhode Island Squandering Its Opportunity to Redevelop I-195?” Governor Gina Raimondo appointed new commissioners upon taking office in 2015 and the battle over whether the PawSox were going to move to 195 land dominated the summer of 2015.
Fast forward to 2016 - the Commission has purchase and sales agreements for the proposed Waldorf project on Parcel 30, the Wexford Science and Technology and CV Properties on Parcels 22 and 25, and Richard Baccari’s Royal Oaks.
“Empty spaces along both sides of the river, waiting for development, make this important area look like the detritus of thoughtless Urban Renewal,” quipped GoLocal architectural critic Will Morgan last month, however.
“Executing on the projects we’ve talking about clearly is a high priority,” said Azrack. “We want to see bridge completed in next year or so, and have these projects that we talked about being being well underway, and to get the park construction and the like — and I think we’ll see in the course of the next 12-18 months, we’ll see additional proposals that move to the P&S agreement stage on both the east and west side.”
On Monday, the Commission is set to consider presentations by Waldorf and Wexford — as well as an “informational presentation” by Cambridge Innovation Center, which dubs itself as having “more startups than anywhere on the planet.”
New Prospects
Azrack spoke to the proposal by New York Development Jason Fane, which had originally been three towers on the west side of the parcel, which Fane switched last week to just one tower for “phase one."
“I think that from the city’s point of view, and an urban design point of view, I think its important to listen to community groups and what residents and businesses have to say about things,” said Fane. “The commission has its own process. We have our urban design consultants taking a look at the project in terms of what the impact would be — plus or minus — on abutting uses, and over the long term development of the area and what will have the greatest positive impact for the city, and the jewelry district.”
“We’re in the process of doing an economic feasibility analysis. Nobody wants to green light a project that is not economically feasible - cause that doesn’t really get you anywhere,” said Azrack. “I think that [report’s] weeks not months to go through the process. Whether we’ll have completed that by end of year is depending on how quickly our consultants get the work product to us and we digest that. But again, it's weeks not months.”
“It’s a large scale development, and not just for Providence. If this project were proposed with 1000 units, 300 parking spaces plus retail and commercial in Boston or even in New York - it would still be a large scale project,” said Azrack. “We have to look at it seriously and we have to look at its impact on the city from an economic and land use and community point of view.”
Related Slideshow: Reactions to Fane’s “One Tower” Proposal on 195 - December 9, 2016
Related Articles
- NEW: 195 Redevelopment Consultant Contract Draws Nine Bidders
- Raimondo Names 6 New 195 Commissioners
- NEW: Providence Stadium Deal Opponents Pressure 195 Commission into Open Meeting
- Owners of Potential New PawSox Site Issue Statement As Alternative to 195 Land
- NEW: Providence Foundation Endorses 195 Location for Stadium
- Minority Contractors Question Being Blocked From I-195 Development
- Opponents Blast Tax Breaks for 195 Dormitory Deal
- Fung, Taveras Leasing Campaign Headquarters from 195 Bidder Carpionato
- NEW: Newport Yachting Center Sold to 195 Kane’s Firm
- Providence City Council Members Question Dormitory Deal on 195 Land
- PODCAST: Opponents Blast Tax Breaks for 195 Dormitory Deal
- 195 Commission Announces New BioTech Proposal for Providence Land
- Critics Raise Questions Over New 195 Tax Break Plan for Providence
- Thoughts on Dumbing Down Politicians, Visual Illiteracy, and I-195
- Guest MINDSETTER™ VanderWeele: The I-195 Land - Subdivide & Conquer
- Aponte Slams 195 Tower Proposal in Providence
- Take a Tour of the Proposed 3 Towers on 195 Land
- Will 3 Towers on 195 Land Kill Superman Building’s Future for Residential?
- NEW: 195 Commission Director Brodie Resigns
- Providence Preservation Society Opposes 195 Location for Stadium
- EXCLUSIVE: Major Music Promoter Eyeing 195 Stadium Land in Providence
- New “One Tower” Design for 195 in Providence Draws Mixed Reaction
