Welcome! Login | Register
 

Pats Escape New York With 17-16 Win—Patriots Win in New York, Clinch first round…

Sky Chiefs Bounce Back, Roll Spirit 119-109—Sky Chiefs bounce back with 119-109 win over…

25 Great Last Minute Local Gifts in RI—Still haven’t finished your Christmas shopping? Check out…

NEW: RWU Moving into Former 38 Studios Offices in Providence—Roger Williams University has agreed to a 12-year…

Guest MINDSETTER™ Justin Katz: Edwards Dances Around the Fact That I’m Right—It’s tempting to go line by line through…

Friars Top UMass 85-65 in Saturday Matinee at The Dunk—Friars beat UMass 85-65 at Dunkin Donuts Center

Sky Chiefs to Host Holiday Hoops Clinic at Providence Country Day—Sky Chiefs to host hoops clinic at Providence…

Second Half Defensive Lockdown Leads Rams Past Detroit 69-55—Rams shut down Detroit in second half, win…

Americans Identifying Race Relations as a Top Issue Sharply Rises According to Gallup Poll—Gallup released results from a new poll on…

NEW: Mayor-Elect Elorza Retains Public Safety Commissioner and Chief of Police—Elorza today announced his decision to retain Public…

 
 

LEGAL MATTERS: Be Wary of Litigation Lenders

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

 

That loan to bridge a plaintiff through to an award for medical expenses may sound like a smart idea, but it can come at a very steep price. Don't be fooled.

Plaintiffs who have suffered grave injuries as a result of the actions of others often face difficulty meeting their day-to-day expenses while they are waiting for their cases to resolve because they are unable to work or have uncovered medical expenses. In recent years, more and more have turned to litigation lenders in an effort to bridge that gap unaware that these loans can accrue interest up to 200%.

Litigation lenders loan Plaintiffs money to meet their expenses while Plaintiffs wait for their cases to be resolved. Because lenders are paid back from the proceeds of the lawsuit, they lend money only to those Plaintiffs likely to win.

If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is

However, these loans can come at a huge cost to Plaintiffs. While most lenders are subject to usury laws – laws that control interest rates – litigation lenders escape that by avoiding specific terminology, such as renaming interest a “use fee”. Equally astounding is that the litigation lenders contend that the loans are not even loans because lenders only recover if the Plaintiff wins. And, because litigation lenders are not considered creditors under the Federal Truth in Lending Act, lenders don’t have to disclose annual percentage rates so borrowers have no idea what their interest rate is. This has led to borrowers signing up for loans with APRs between 58% and 200%. How out of the realm of normal is this? Under RI GEN LAW § 6-26-2, other lenders can charge no more than 21 percent or the domestic prime rate plus nine percent.

So, how is it that no one knows what the interest rate is? Here’s how one litigation lender does it. The lender charges a monthly “use fee” (i.e. interest) from the date it makes the “loan” until the lender is paid back. The “use fee” amount is set forth in increasing amounts for the first six months. Here’s the catch – if the Plaintiff pays the “use fee” even ONE day after the expiration of the first six months, the use fee automatically jumps to the full, one-year rate.

In order for Plaintiffs to receive these loans, their attorneys must sign off on them. Our firm, like many, has a policy of advising our clients not to take these loans and we routinely refuse to sign off on the agreements. This year, the Rhode Island Association of Justice (RIAJ), of which we are members, worked with members of the General Assembly -- Representatives Michael Marcello, (D-41), Peter J. Petrarca (D-44), Cale P. Keable, (D-47) Charlene Lima (D-14), and Christopher R. Blazejewski (D-2) -- to bring these loans into compliance with state and federal laws governing lending. Although the legislation did not pass this year, there will likely be an ongoing effort to tackle this issue in the future given its detrimental impact on Plaintiffs.

The foregoing is offered for informational purposes only and is not legal advice nor does it create an attorney-client relationship.

Susan G. Pegden is a litigation associate with the Law Firm of Hamel, Waxler, Allen & Collins in Providence.  She is admitted to practice in Rhode Island and Massachusetts and is a member of the Board of Governors of the Rhode Island Association of Justice (RIAJ) and a member of the Rhode Island Women’s Bar Association.

Sean P. Feeney is a partner with the Law Firm of Hamel, Waxler, Allen & Collins. He is admitted to practice in Rhode Island, Illinois and Wisconsin. Mr. Feeney is a former special counsel to the City of Providence, military prosecutor with the United States Marine Corps and Special Assistant United States Attorney for the Central District of California.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 
:)