Friday Financial Five – September 21st, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
Was QE3 necessary?
Last week’s announcement about another round of Quantitative Easing was received well by the markets, especially for commodities, but at what cost? QE3 will continue a weak dollar policy and it emphasizes that the United States’ will be in training wheels for an open ended amount of bond buying. The Federal Reserve continues to move markets, but that’s really not their purpose. With housing numbers appearing to rebound, is it possible our economy would have experienced a natural expansion without Fed intervention and the accumulation of more debt?
With a few months to go before the Presidential election, it looks like the discussion is shifting from the totality of the economic numbers to federal tax policy. Taking a look at numbers from the Tax Policy Center, 46 percent (47 percent according to other sources) of households paid no federal income tax in 2011, including 94 percent of those making less than $50,000. The percentage of non-contributors drops to 18 percent when you factor in contributions to federal entitlement programs. The combination of Bush-era tax cuts and recent extensions of several deductions helped create this tax framework and partially offset the last decade’s wage stagnation for the nation’s lowest earners.
Corporate profits expected to drop
Profits are expected to drop for the first time since 2009, and that could really dampen the unemployment numbers going forward. Following the Great Recession, companies moved swiftly to reduce employees and overhead, and in return, saw prodigious profit growth. If large companies start seeing profits drop, it’s going to take a greater surge of new businesses and entrepreneurs to lead the unemployment recovery.
For those of us in the middle of our working years, traditional pension plans are being phased out. That’s not the case for soon-to-be retirees, who will be given an option of how to take their retirement money once they call it a career. The choice is usually to take the money in a lump sum or to spread the money out in periodic payments based on the life of the retiree, and possibly the retiree’s spouse. The first consideration is longevity. If there are health issues, the lump sum might be the way to go. If you’re healthy and take the lump sum, you would need to generate enough return to match the internal rate of return for the annuity income stream. If you do take the annuity and have a spouse, you’ll want to make sure there’s enough money available if you pass away first.
IBM trying to capitalize on Watson
The battle to dominate information technology continues on. You might remember Watson, the data analyzing computer that took out the best champions on the television show Jeopardy! Similar to Apple’s Siri, IBM has plans to make their high profile product available on a handheld device to provide information for corporate partners. It’s already in use providing medical and financial feedback with different companies. IBM’s goal is to broaden Watson’s knowledge base and increase the company’s customer base and revenue stream.
- Friday Financial Five – August 10th, 2012
- Friday Financial Five – August 3rd, 2012
- Friday Financial Five – July 27th, 2012
- Friday Financial Five – September 14th, 2012
- Friday Financial Five – September 7th, 2012
- Friday Financial Five – August 31st, 2012
- Friday Financial Five – August 24th, 2012
- Friday Financial Five—August 17th, 2012